Breakdown of La bankejo estas apud la vilaĝo.
Questions & Answers about La bankejo estas apud la vilaĝo.
Why is it bankejo instead of banko?
The suffix -ej- means place used for something or establishment/building connected with something.
So:
- banko = a bank, the institution
- bankejo = the bank building / bank premises / banking place
In many contexts, people do just say banko for bank, but bankejo makes it especially clear that we mean the physical place.
What does the ending -o mean in bankejo and vilaĝo?
The ending -o marks a noun in Esperanto.
So:
- bankejo = bank building / bank place
- vilaĝo = village
This is one of the most basic Esperanto patterns:
- -o = noun
- -a = adjective
- -e = adverb
- -i = infinitive verb
- -as = present tense verb
Why is it estas?
Estas is the present tense of esti, which means to be.
So:
- mi estas = I am
- vi estas = you are
- li/ŝi estas = he/she is
- ili estas = they are
Unlike English, the form does not change depending on the subject. It is always estas in the present tense.
So La bankejo estas apud la vilaĝo literally means The bank building is beside the village.
What does apud mean exactly?
Apud means next to, beside, or nearby at the side of.
In this sentence:
- apud la vilaĝo = next to the village
It usually suggests fairly close physical proximity.
A few comparisons:
- apud = beside / next to
- proksime de = near
- en = in
- sur = on
- antaŭ = in front of
- malantaŭ = behind
So apud is a good choice when something is right by something else.
Why is there no -n ending on vilaĝo?
Because apud is a preposition, and here it simply introduces a place.
So:
- apud la vilaĝo = next to the village
No accusative -n is needed here.
The -n ending is mainly used for:
- Direct objects
- Motion toward something in some expressions
But in this sentence, la vilaĝo is just the object of the preposition apud, not a direct object.
Why is there la before both nouns?
La is the definite article, meaning the.
So:
- la bankejo = the bank building
- la vilaĝo = the village
Esperanto has only one definite article: la.
It does not have a separate word for a/an.
So:
- bankejo can mean a bank building or just bank building depending on context
- la bankejo means the bank building
Can the word order be changed?
Yes, Esperanto word order is fairly flexible.
The normal straightforward order here is:
- La bankejo estas apud la vilaĝo.
But you could also say:
- Apud la vilaĝo estas la bankejo.
That puts more focus on the location first: Next to the village is the bank.
Even though word order can vary, the basic subject + verb + complement order is usually the easiest for learners.
How do you pronounce bankejo?
A helpful approximation is:
- bahn-KEH-yo
Breakdown:
- bank = much like English bank
- ej = like ey in they, but shorter/purer
- o = a clear o sound
So bankejo has three parts:
- bank-
- -ej-
- -o
And j in Esperanto sounds like English y.
How do you pronounce vilaĝo?
A rough English approximation is:
- vee-LAH-zho
Important parts:
- vi = vee
- la = lah
- ĝ = like the s in measure or the g in genre
- o = clear o
So ĝ is not like English hard g in go.
What does the suffix -ej- usually mean in Esperanto?
-ej- means place for, place connected with, or establishment where something happens.
Examples:
lerni = to learn
lernejo = schoolkuiri = to cook
kuirejo = kitchenpreĝi = to pray
preĝejo = church
So in bankejo, the idea is a place connected with banking.
This is a very productive and useful suffix in Esperanto.
Is vilaĝo the same as town?
Not exactly. Vilaĝo usually means village.
A village is generally smaller than a town.
Related words:
- vilaĝo = village
- urbo = town / city
- urbeto = small town
So if the meaning shown to you was village, vilaĝo is the correct word.
Could this sentence also mean The bank is near the village?
It could be translated that way in some contexts, but apud is usually stronger than just near.
More precise translations of apud are:
- next to
- beside
- right by
If you want a looser idea of near, Esperanto often uses:
- proksime de la vilaĝo = near the village
So apud la vilaĝo suggests closer contact or adjacency than just general nearness.
Why doesn’t Esperanto use different forms for is/am/are?
Because Esperanto verbs are much simpler than English verbs.
In the present tense, every subject uses -as:
- mi estas = I am
- vi estas = you are
- li estas = he is
- ŝi estas = she is
- ĝi estas = it is
- ni estas = we are
- ili estas = they are
This is one reason Esperanto grammar is often easier for learners: verbs do not change according to person or number.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning EsperantoMaster Esperanto — from La bankejo estas apud la vilaĝo to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions