Breakdown of Door rustig te praten lossen we het misverstand op.
wij
we
praten
to talk
rustig
calmly
door
by
het misverstand
the misunderstanding
oplossen
to solve
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Dutch grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Door rustig te praten lossen we het misverstand op.
What does the structure Door ... te + infinitive mean, and why is it used here?
It means "by (doing) ..." and expresses method. After the preposition door, Dutch uses te + infinitive. So Door rustig te praten = "By speaking calmly." The subject of the main clause (we) is understood for the te-clause.
Why does the finite verb lossen come right after the introductory phrase?
Dutch main clauses follow the V2 rule: the conjugated verb is in second position. Since the sentence starts with Door rustig te praten, the verb lossen must come next, followed by the subject: Door rustig te praten lossen we ...
Why is op at the very end, separate from lossen?
Because oplossen is a separable verb. In main clauses, the particle op goes to the end:
- Main clause: We lossen het misverstand op.
- With an initial element: Door rustig te praten lossen we het misverstand op.
- With a pronoun: We lossen het op.
- Subordinate clause: dat we het misverstand oplossen (no split)
- With te-infinitive: op te lossen
- Past participle: opgelost
Can I also say We lossen het misverstand op door rustig te praten?
Yes. That word order is very natural. Starting with Door rustig te praten adds emphasis to the method.
What’s the difference between we and wij?
Both mean "we." we is the unstressed default; wij is stressed for emphasis or contrast (e.g., Wij lossen het op, niet zij).
Why is it het misverstand, not de misverstand?
misverstand is a neuter noun (het-woord).
- Singular: het misverstand
- Plural: de misverstanden
- Indefinite: een misverstand
What does rustig convey here—"calmly" or "quietly"?
Primarily "calmly, in an unagitated manner." It can imply a quiet, unhurried tone but not necessarily whispering.
- rustig = calm(ly), unhurried
- stil = silent
- zachtjes = softly (low volume)
- langzaam = slowly (speed)
- kalm = calm (near-synonym, slightly more formal)
Can I use spreken instead of praten?
Yes: Door rustig te spreken lossen we het misverstand op.
praten is more informal/conversational; spreken is a bit more formal or used for speaking ability/language.
How do I express purpose instead of means? Is door the same as om ... te ...?
They differ:
- door ... te ... = by (means of) doing X (method)
- om ... te ... = in order to do X (purpose) Examples:
- Means: Door rustig te praten lossen we het misverstand op.
- Purpose: Om het misverstand op te lossen, praten we rustig. Related: Doordat we rustig praten, ... means "because/since we speak calmly" (cause).
Where does negation go with a te-infinitive?
Put niet before te:
- Negating the action: Door niet te praten lossen we niets op.
- Negating the manner: Door niet rustig te praten ... (= by speaking in an agitated way). Often you’d use a clearer antonym, e.g., Door geagiteerd te praten ...
How would this look in the past or perfect tense?
- Simple past: Door rustig te praten losten we het misverstand op.
- Present perfect: We hebben het misverstand door rustig te praten opgelost. Note the participle of oplossen is opgelost (prefix before ge- because it’s separable).
Do I need a comma after Door rustig te praten?
It’s optional. Dutch doesn’t require a comma here. Writers may add one after a long introductory phrase for readability, but in this short sentence it’s typically omitted.