Breakdown of De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen.
Questions & Answers about De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen.
What exactly is ontvangstbevestiging, and why is it such a long word?
Ontvangstbevestiging is a compound noun, which is very common in Dutch.
It is made up of:
- ontvangst = receipt / receiving
- bevestiging = confirmation
So ontvangstbevestiging literally means receipt confirmation, or more naturally in English, acknowledgement of receipt.
Dutch often joins nouns together into one word where English would use several words.
Why do I see both ontvangstbevestiging and bevestigt in the same sentence? Are they related?
Yes, they are related.
- bevestiging = confirmation (noun)
- bevestigt = confirms (verb, present tense)
So:
- De ontvangstbevestiging = the acknowledgement of receipt
- bevestigt = confirms
This kind of repetition is normal in formal Dutch, especially in administrative or legal language.
What is bezwaarschrift?
Bezwaarschrift is another compound noun:
- bezwaar = objection
- schrift = writing / written document
So bezwaarschrift means a formal written objection, often in legal or administrative contexts.
It is more formal and specific than just bezwaar.
A bezwaar is the objection itself; a bezwaarschrift is the written document in which you submit that objection.
Why is it de ontvangstbevestiging but het bezwaarschrift?
Because Dutch nouns take different definite articles:
- de for common-gender nouns
- het for neuter nouns
So you simply have to learn:
- de ontvangstbevestiging
- het bezwaarschrift
Unfortunately, there is not always a clear logical reason from the meaning alone. This is just part of learning each noun with its article.
Why is the verb bevestigt in second position?
Because this is a normal Dutch main clause, and Dutch main clauses usually follow the V2 rule: the finite verb comes in the second position.
Here the structure is:
- De ontvangstbevestiging = subject
- bevestigt = finite verb
- dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen = rest of the sentence
So bevestigt must come second.
Why does the clause after dat have a different word order?
Because dat introduces a subordinate clause, and subordinate clauses in Dutch usually send the verbs to the end.
So:
- main clause: De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt ...
- subordinate clause: dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen
In the subordinate clause, the verbal part is ontvangen comes at the end.
This is one of the biggest differences from English.
Why is it is ontvangen and not heeft ontvangen?
Because this is a passive construction.
- heeft ontvangen = has received
- is ontvangen = has been received
Here the sentence is not saying who received the objection. It is saying that the objection was received.
So:
- het bezwaarschrift heeft ontvangen would be wrong here, because the objection itself is not doing the receiving
- het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen means the letter of objection has been received
Is ontvangen here a past participle?
Yes.
The verb is ontvangen = to receive.
Its past participle is also ontvangen.
So in is ontvangen:
- is = auxiliary verb
- ontvangen = past participle
Together they form the passive perfect-like structure meaning has been received.
Why is there no comma before dat?
Because Dutch does not always use a comma before dat the way English often does before that-clauses.
In this sentence, the subordinate clause is a normal essential part of the sentence, so no comma is needed:
- De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen.
A comma here would usually look unnatural.
Is this sentence natural Dutch, or is it especially formal?
It is natural, but definitely formal and administrative.
This is the kind of sentence you might see in:
- official letters
- government communication
- legal procedures
- automated acknowledgements
In everyday speech, people would usually say something simpler, such as:
- We bevestigen dat we uw bezwaarschrift hebben ontvangen.
- Uw bezwaarschrift is ontvangen.
But the original sentence is perfectly normal in official writing.
Why does Dutch use such formal nouns instead of a simpler verb-based sentence?
Dutch official style often prefers noun-heavy formulations, much like formal English does.
Compare:
- formal Dutch: De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt dat ...
- simpler Dutch: Wij bevestigen dat ...
The first sounds more impersonal and bureaucratic. That is often preferred in official writing because it sounds neutral and standardized.
Could bezwaarschrift ever be replaced by just bezwaar?
Sometimes, but not always.
- bezwaar = objection
- bezwaarschrift = written objection / notice of objection
In casual contexts, people may loosely say bezwaar even when they mean the document. But in legal or administrative language, bezwaarschrift is more precise because it refers to the actual written submission.
So in this sentence, bezwaarschrift is the better formal choice.
How would I translate the structure literally, word for word?
A very literal breakdown would be:
- De ontvangstbevestiging = the acknowledgement of receipt
- bevestigt = confirms
- dat = that
- het bezwaarschrift = the notice of objection / written objection
- is ontvangen = has been received
So literally:
The acknowledgement of receipt confirms that the written objection has been received.
Even though the meaning may sound repetitive in English, this is quite normal in formal Dutch.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from De ontvangstbevestiging bevestigt dat het bezwaarschrift is ontvangen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions