Breakdown of Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen.
Questions & Answers about Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen.
Why does opgave become opgaven?
Because Danish usually puts the definite article on the end of the noun.
- opgave = assignment
- opgaven = the assignment
So the ending -n / -en often does the job that English the does.
The same thing happens with lærer → læreren:
- lærer = teacher
- læreren = the teacher
Why is there no separate word for the in this sentence?
Danish often expresses definiteness with a suffix instead of a separate word.
So instead of English:
- the assignment
- the teacher
Danish uses:
- opgaven
- læreren
A separate definite word can appear in some other structures, especially with adjectives, for example den store opgave = the big assignment, but not in this simple noun form.
Why is bliver rettet used here?
This is the passive voice.
- Active: Læreren retter opgaven i morgen = the teacher corrects the assignment tomorrow
- Passive: Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen = the assignment is corrected / will be corrected by the teacher tomorrow
In the passive, the focus shifts from the doer to the thing affected by the action. Here, the sentence is focusing on opgaven, not on læreren.
What kind of passive is bliver rettet?
It is the blive-passive:
- bliver = present tense of blive
- rettet = past participle of rette
This pattern is very common in Danish:
- Bogen bliver læst = the book is being read / will be read
- Døren bliver åbnet = the door is being opened / will be opened
So bliver + past participle is one standard way to form the passive.
Why is it rettet and not retter or rette?
Because after bliver in this passive construction, Danish uses the past participle.
The verb is:
- infinitive: at rette
- present tense: retter
- past participle: rettet
So:
- retter would be a normal present-tense active form
- rettet is the form needed after bliver in the passive
That is why you get bliver rettet.
Does this sentence mean present time or future time?
Grammatically, bliver is present tense, but because the sentence includes i morgen, the meaning is understood as future.
Danish often uses the present tense for future events when the time is clear.
So this sentence is naturally understood as something like:
- the assignment will be corrected tomorrow
This is very normal in Danish.
Could you also say Opgaven rettes af læreren i morgen?
Yes. That is also correct.
Danish has another passive form, often called the s-passive:
- Opgaven bliver rettet
- Opgaven rettes
Both can mean roughly the same thing here.
A useful general difference is:
- blive-passive often feels a bit more like an event or process
- s-passive can sound a bit more formal, general, or written, depending on context
In many cases, both are possible, but bliver rettet is very common and easy for learners to recognize.
Why is af læreren used?
In a passive sentence, af introduces the agent — the person who performs the action.
So:
- af læreren = by the teacher
This is like English by in passive sentences:
- The assignment is corrected by the teacher
Do not confuse this with fra, which usually means from. In passive sentences, Danish normally uses af for the doer.
Is af læreren necessary?
No. It can be left out if the doer is unknown, obvious, or unimportant.
For example:
- Opgaven bliver rettet i morgen = the assignment will be corrected tomorrow
That is still a complete and natural sentence. Passive sentences often omit the agent.
Why is i morgen at the end of the sentence?
That is a very normal place for a time expression in Danish. Time phrases often come later in the sentence.
So this word order is completely natural:
- Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen
But Danish is flexible, and you can also move i morgen to the front for emphasis:
- I morgen bliver opgaven rettet af læreren
When you do that, the verb still has to stay in second position, so bliver comes before opgaven.
Why is the word order Opgaven bliver and not Opgaven rettet bliver?
Because in Danish main clauses, the finite verb normally comes early in the sentence, usually in second position.
Here:
- Opgaven = first element
- bliver = finite verb in second position
- rettet = participle later in the verb phrase
So the structure is:
- subject + finite verb + past participle + other elements
This is a basic pattern you will see again and again in Danish.
What would the active version of this sentence be?
The active version is:
- Læreren retter opgaven i morgen
That version focuses more directly on læreren as the subject.
Compare:
- Læreren retter opgaven i morgen = active
- Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen = passive
Both are correct; they just organize the information differently.
Is this a natural sentence in Danish, or would an active sentence sound better?
It is a natural Danish sentence. However, in everyday speech, Danish often prefers the active if the doer is known and important.
So in conversation, many speakers might more naturally say:
- Læreren retter opgaven i morgen
But the passive sentence is still perfectly normal, especially if the main topic is opgaven rather than læreren.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Opgaven bliver rettet af læreren i morgen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions