Breakdown of Kom, vi spiller runden igen; ingen må snyde.
Questions & Answers about Kom, vi spiller runden igen; ingen må snyde.
Why is it Kom and not kommer?
Kom is the imperative form of the verb at komme (to come).
So:
- at komme = to come
- kommer = come/comes, present tense
- kom = come! / come on!
In this sentence, Kom is being used like Come on or Come to start the action.
Native English speakers often expect something like Come, let’s..., and that is basically what is happening here.
Why is there no subject after Kom?
In Danish, as in English, the imperative usually leaves out the subject.
So instead of saying:
- Du kom or something similar
you simply say:
- Kom! = Come!
The subject is understood. It is normally you.
Here, Kom, vi spiller runden igen works like:
- Come on, we’re playing the round again
- or more naturally, Come on, let’s play the round again
Why does it say vi spiller instead of something more like let’s play?
Danish often uses the present tense to talk about something that is about to happen, especially in casual speech.
So vi spiller runden igen literally looks like:
- we play the round again
but in context it means something like:
- we’re playing the round again
- let’s play the round again
- we’ll play the round again
This is a very natural Danish way to suggest or announce the next action.
If Danish wants to be more explicitly like let’s, it can also use lad os:
- Lad os spille runden igen
But Kom, vi spiller runden igen sounds more lively and conversational.
What does runden mean, and why is it -en at the end?
Runden means the round.
The base noun is:
- en runde = a round
In Danish, the definite article is often added to the end of the noun rather than written as a separate word.
So:
- en runde = a round
- runden = the round
Here it is definite because the speaker means a specific round, probably the one they have just played or are about to replay.
Why is igen placed after runden?
Igen means again, and its position is normal here.
- vi spiller runden igen
This is a very natural order in Danish: verb + object + igen.
It means:
- we play the round again
- more naturally, we play the round again / let’s play the round again
You may also see igen in slightly different positions in other sentences, but here the placement is straightforward and idiomatic.
What exactly does ingen må snyde mean grammatically?
Break it down like this:
- ingen = no one / nobody
- må = may / is allowed to / must
- snyde = cheat
So literally:
- No one may cheat
In natural English, that often becomes:
- No one is allowed to cheat
- Nobody may cheat
- No cheating
The structure is:
- subject: ingen
- modal verb: må
- infinitive: snyde
Why is it må snyde and not må at snyde?
After a modal verb in Danish, the next verb normally appears in the bare infinitive, without at.
So:
- må snyde = may cheat / is allowed to cheat
- not må at snyde
This is similar to English:
- can go, not can to go
- must stop, not must to stop
Common Danish modal verbs include:
- kan = can
- skal = shall/must
- vil = will/want to
- må = may/must
All of them are followed by the infinitive without at.
Why does Danish use ingen må snyde instead of something like ingen må ikke snyde?
Because ingen already gives the negative idea: no one.
So:
- ingen må snyde = no one may cheat
If you say ingen må ikke snyde, you create a kind of double negative that does not mean the intended thing in normal Danish.
To express the rule correctly, Danish usually chooses one of these:
- Ingen må snyde = No one may cheat
- Man må ikke snyde = You must not cheat / One may not cheat
Both are correct, but they are built differently.
What is må doing here—does it mean may or must?
Må can be tricky because it can express different ideas depending on context.
It can mean things like:
- may / be allowed to
- must / have to
In ingen må snyde, it clearly means is allowed to in a negative rule-like sense:
- No one is allowed to cheat
So although English may can sound formal, that is the closest literal match.
Why is there a semicolon in the sentence?
The semicolon joins two closely related clauses:
- Kom, vi spiller runden igen
- ingen må snyde
They are connected in meaning, but each could stand on its own.
So the semicolon works a bit like a strong comma or a softer full stop:
- Come on, we’re playing the round again; no one may cheat.
You could also see this written with a full stop in everyday writing:
- Kom, vi spiller runden igen. Ingen må snyde.
The semicolon just shows the two ideas belong together.
Could this sentence be translated word-for-word into natural English?
Not really. A very literal version would be:
- Come, we play the round again; no one may cheat.
That is understandable, but not natural English.
A more natural English version would be something like:
- Come on, let’s play the round again; no cheating.
- Come on, we’re playing the round again; nobody’s allowed to cheat.
This is a good example of how Danish and English often use different structures even when the meaning is the same.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Kom, vi spiller runden igen; ingen må snyde to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions