Breakdown of Přestože vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz, nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby.
Questions & Answers about Přestože vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz, nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby.
Why does the sentence start with Přestože? What kind of word is it?
Přestože is a conjunction meaning although / even though / despite the fact that. It introduces a subordinate clause.
So in this sentence:
Přestože vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz, ...
the first part means Although the owner of the property/building brought an ID card, ...
A close synonym is ačkoli. In many contexts, přestože and ačkoli are interchangeable.
Because the Přestože-clause comes first, it is followed by a comma.
Why is there a comma after průkaz?
The comma separates the subordinate clause from the main clause.
- Přestože vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz = subordinate clause
- nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby = main clause
Czech punctuation regularly uses a comma before or after subordinate clauses introduced by conjunctions like že, když, protože, pokud, přestože, ačkoli, etc.
Why is it vlastník objektu and not vlastník objekt?
Because objektu is in the genitive singular.
The noun vlastník means owner, and Czech often uses the genitive to express owner of something:
- vlastník objektu = owner of the building/property/object
- majitel auta = owner of the car
- správce domu = manager of the house
So:
- vlastník = nominative singular
- objektu = genitive singular of objekt
What exactly does objekt mean here?
Objekt is a fairly formal word. Depending on context, it can mean:
- building
- property
- facility
- sometimes more generally object
In a sentence like this, vlastník objektu will usually mean something like the owner of the building/property/premises. The exact English translation depends on the wider context.
Why is it přinesl? What does that form tell us?
Přinesl is the past tense, masculine singular form of the verb přinést (to bring).
It tells you that the subject is grammatically masculine singular:
- on přinesl = he brought
- ona přinesla = she brought
- oni přinesli = they brought (masculine animate / mixed)
- ony přinesly = they brought (non-masculine animate in standard usage)
Since the sentence has vlastník (a masculine noun), the past tense appears as přinesl.
Why is the verb přinést used here, and not nést or přinášet?
Přinést is a perfective verb, so it presents the action as completed: to bring / to have brought.
That fits this context well, because the sentence refers to a completed action:
- he brought the ID card
Compare:
- nést = to carry, to be carrying
- přinášet = to bring repeatedly / habitually / imperfectively
- přinést = to bring once, successfully, as a completed action
So přinesl občanský průkaz suggests a completed event: he came and brought the document.
Why is it občanský průkaz? Is that just ID card?
Yes. Občanský průkaz is the standard Czech term for a national identity card, often translated as ID card or identity card.
Literally:
- občanský = civic / citizen-related
- průkaz = card, pass, identification document
In everyday Czech, people often shorten it to:
- občanka = informal for ID card
So:
- přinesl občanský průkaz = brought an ID card
Why doesn’t občanský průkaz change form here? Shouldn’t the object be in the accusative?
It is in the accusative, but for this noun phrase the accusative looks the same as the nominative.
Občanský průkaz is masculine inanimate singular. For many masculine inanimate nouns, the nominative and accusative singular are identical.
So:
- nominative: občanský průkaz
- accusative: občanský průkaz
That is why after přinesl you still see občanský průkaz with no visible change.
Why is the second verb in the present tense: nemá? Shouldn’t it also be past tense?
Not necessarily. Czech, like English, can combine a past event with a present state.
Here the idea is:
- he brought an ID card earlier
- but he does not have the consent now / in the relevant situation
So the sentence contrasts:
- a completed past action: přinesl
- a current fact or ongoing situation: nemá
If the speaker wanted everything in the past, they could say something like neměl souhlas oprávněné osoby (he did not have the consent of an authorized person), but nemá is perfectly natural if the lack of consent is still true now.
What case is souhlas oprávněné osoby, and how does it work?
In nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby:
- souhlas is the direct object, so it is in the accusative singular
- oprávněné osoby is in the genitive singular, meaning of the authorized person
So the structure is:
- mít souhlas koho/čeho = to have the consent of whom/of what
Examples:
- má souhlas rodičů = he has the parents’ consent
- má souhlas majitele = he has the owner’s consent
- má souhlas oprávněné osoby = he has the consent of an authorized person
Why is it oprávněné osoby and not oprávněná osoba?
Because the phrase is in the genitive singular, not the nominative.
Base form:
In the genitive singular:
- oprávněné osoby = of an authorized person
Both words change because the adjective must agree with the noun in gender, number, and case:
- nominative singular feminine: oprávněná osoba
- genitive singular feminine: oprávněné osoby
What does oprávněná osoba mean exactly?
Oprávněná osoba is a formal/legal expression meaning:
- authorized person
- entitled person
- person with the proper authority/right
The adjective oprávněný / oprávněná comes from the idea of having a legal right, entitlement, or authorization.
In official contexts, this usually means someone who is legally allowed to give consent, approve something, act on behalf of someone, or exercise a certain right.
Is the word order fixed here, or could it be changed?
The sentence is natural as written, but Czech word order is more flexible than English word order.
Original:
You could also say:
- Vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz, přestože nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby.
But that changes the emphasis and may sound a bit different in information structure.
The original version emphasizes the contrast very clearly:
- although he brought an ID card
- he still does not have the necessary consent
So while Czech allows flexibility, the given word order is formal, clear, and very natural.
Why are there no words corresponding to the or an?
Because Czech does not have articles like English the and a/an.
So:
- vlastník objektu can mean the owner of the property/building or an owner of a property/building, depending on context
- občanský průkaz can mean an ID card or the ID card
- souhlas oprávněné osoby can mean the consent of an authorized person or consent from an authorized person
Czech relies on context rather than articles to show whether something is definite or indefinite.
Is this a formal sentence?
Yes, very much so.
Several expressions make it sound formal or administrative:
- vlastník objektu
- občanský průkaz
- souhlas oprávněné osoby
This sounds like language you might find in:
- an official notice
- legal or administrative communication
- property access rules
- a bureaucratic or security-related context
In everyday conversation, people might choose simpler wording, but in official Czech this style is completely normal.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning CzechMaster Czech — from Přestože vlastník objektu přinesl občanský průkaz, nemá souhlas oprávněné osoby to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions