Log inSign up

Možemo premjestiti stol bliže prozoru da bude više svjetla.

Možemo premjestiti stol bliže prozoru da bude više svjetla.
We can move the table closer to the window so there is more light.

Breakdown of Možemo premjestiti stol bliže prozoru da bude više svjetla.

biti
to be
moći
to be able to
stol
table
prozor
window
više
more
da
so that
svjetlo
light
bliže
closer
premjestiti
to move
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Questions & Answers about Možemo premjestiti stol bliže prozoru da bude više svjetla.

Why is it Možemo and not Možemo li?

Both are possible, but they sound slightly different:

  • Možemo premjestiti… often functions like a suggestion/offer: We can move… / Let’s move…
  • Možemo li premjestiti…? is a more explicit question: Can we move…? (asking for permission/feasibility)

In writing, the difference is also signaled by punctuation and intonation: a question mark strongly pushes you toward Možemo li…?

What exactly does možemo mean here—can, may, or let’s?

Literally, možemo = we can (1st person plural of moći, “to be able to”).
In real usage, Možemo premjestiti… is often a polite proposal: We could move the table… / Let’s move the table… depending on context.

Why is stol in the form stol and not something else?

Because it’s the direct object of the verb premjestiti (“to move/relocate [something]”), so it’s in the accusative.
For masculine inanimate nouns like stol, accusative = nominative, so the form stays stol.

What’s the difference between premjestiti and pomaknuti?

Both can translate as “move,” but:

  • premjestiti = move/relocate to a different position/place (often implies “repositioning”)
  • pomaknuti = move/shift a bit (often a smaller movement)

So premjestiti stol bliže prozoru sounds like intentionally repositioning the table closer to the window.

Is premjestiti perfective? What would the imperfective be?

Yes, premjestiti is perfective (a completed action: “move it (once), reposition it”).
The imperfective partner is commonly premještati (repeated/ongoing: “be moving/repositioning”).

Example contrast:

  • Možemo premjestiti stol… = we can move it (once)
  • Možemo premještati stol… = we can keep moving it around / we can be moving it (context-dependent)
Why is it bliže prozoru and not bliže prozor or bliže prozora?

bliže (“closer”) typically goes with the dative to mark what something is closer to.
So prozoru is dative singular of prozor (“window”).

Pattern: bliže + dative

  • bliže kući = closer to the house
  • bliže prozoru = closer to the window
What case is prozoru, and how do I recognize it?

prozoru is dative singular (also same form as locative singular for many masculine nouns, but here it’s dative because bliže selects it).
Dictionary form: prozor (nominative). Dative/locative singular often ends in -u for masculine nouns.

Why do we use da bude here? Isn’t da usually “that”?

Here da introduces a purpose clause: so that… / in order that…
da bude više svjetla = so that there is more light.

Croatian commonly uses da + present to express purpose, especially in everyday speech.

What is bude exactly? Why not je?

bude is the present tense form of biti (“to be”) used after da in many purpose/desired-result contexts. It corresponds to English “(so that) it will be / there will be.”

je is also “is,” but da je would usually sound different and often needs a different structure (and can feel more like stating a fact in a “that…” clause). For purpose/result here, da bude is the natural choice.

Could this also be da bi bilo više svjetla? What’s the difference?

Yes. da bi bilo više svjetla is also correct and is often a bit more explicit or slightly more formal:

  • da bude više svjetla = so that there’s more light (common, conversational)
  • da bi bilo više svjetla = so that there would be more light (often sounds a bit more “conditional”/planned)

Both communicate purpose; the nuance is small and depends on style.

Why is it više svjetla (with svjetla) and not više svjetlo?

After quantity/comparison words like više (“more”), Croatian typically uses the genitive:

  • više svjetla = more (of) light
    So svjetla is genitive singular of svjetlo (“light”).
How do I pronounce svjetla and what should I watch out for in spelling?

svjetlo / svjetla has the cluster svj (roughly “svy-”), then -e-: svjet-.
Also watch spelling: svjetlo (light) is with je, not svijetlo (a different form that learners often confuse).