Learn Hardcore Croatian: Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu. - She thinks that if we recycle more, we really help the planet.

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

She thinks that if we recycle more, we really help the planet.

Breakdown of Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Questions & Answers about Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

What is the role of da in Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu?

Da is a conjunction that introduces a subordinate clause, and here it corresponds to English that:

Ona misli da ... = She thinks that ...

So the basic structure is:

Ona misli da [stvarno pomažemo planetu].
She thinks that [we really help the planet].

Inside that da‑clause, another clause is inserted with ako (if):
ako recikliramo više = if we recycle more.

So syntactically:

Main clause: Ona misli
Subordinate clause with da: da ... stvarno pomažemo planetu
Inside it: conditional clause with ako recikliramo više

Why is there a comma after da, and why is ako recikliramo više surrounded by commas?

The commas show that ako recikliramo više (if we recycle more) is an inserted conditional clause inside the da‑clause.

You can think of two variants:

With the conditional inserted in the middle (as in the given sentence):
- Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.
  She thinks that, if we recycle more, we really help the planet.
Without that insertion, more “straight line”:
- Ona misli da stvarno pomažemo planetu ako recikliramo više.

In (1), commas mark off the inserted ako‑clause from the rest of the da‑clause.
In (2), you don't need a comma after da because nothing is being inserted there; you only put a comma before ako if it starts the subordinate clause.

Why is recikliramo in the present tense instead of something like ćemo reciklirati (future)?

In Croatian, the present tense is very commonly used in if‑clauses (clauses with ako) to refer to the future, especially in neutral, real conditions:

Ako recikliramo više, pomoći ćemo planetu.
If we recycle more, we will help the planet.

But in your sentence, the whole thing is more general, almost like a “rule” or belief:

ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu
if we recycle more, we really help the planet (in general)

So present tense is natural, just as in English If you heat water, it boils. It expresses a general truth or a typical result, not one specific future event.

Why do we say stvarno pomažemo and not something like bismo pomogli (conditional)?

There is a subtle difference in meaning:

stvarno pomažemo (present):
suggests a real, general fact – we really help the planet (whenever we recycle more).
bismo pomogli (conditional):
suggests a hypothetical situation – we would help the planet (if we recycled more).

Your sentence:

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

presents her belief as a general truth: whenever we recycle more, we really do help the planet.

If you changed it to:

Ona misli da bismo, ako bismo reciklirali više, stvarno pomogli planetu.

that would be more clearly hypothetical or unreal, like English She thinks that, if we recycled more, we would really help the planet.

Is ona necessary here, or can we just say Misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu?

You can absolutely drop ona if the context makes it clear who is being talked about:

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.
Misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

Both are grammatically correct. Croatian is a pro‑drop language, meaning subject pronouns (like ja, ti, on, ona) are often omitted because the verb ending already tells us the person:

misli can mean he/she thinks (3rd person singular).

You keep ona when:

you want to emphasize she (not someone else), or
the subject could be ambiguous without it.

Can the word stvarno move to a different position in the sentence?

Yes. Stvarno (really) is fairly flexible in word order, and several positions are natural, with small differences in emphasis. For example:

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.
Neutral: we really help the planet.
Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, pomažemo stvarno planetu.
Slight emphasis on planet (we really help the planet, as opposed to something else).
Ona stvarno misli da, ako recikliramo više, pomažemo planetu.
Now stvarno modifies misli: She really thinks that... (emphasis on how strongly she thinks it).

So moving stvarno can change what is being emphasized: the helping, the planet, or her thinking.

What exactly does više mean here, and what does it modify?

Više means more and modifies recikliramo:

recikliramo više = we recycle more

It can mean:

more in quantity (more kilograms of waste),
more in frequency (more often),
or both, depending on context.

Word order alternatives:

ako više recikliramo – also correct, same meaning; some speakers may prefer this order in speech.
ako recikliramo više otpada – više then modifies otpada (more waste).

In your sentence, više is understood as more (than now / than before) and naturally attaches to the verb recikliramo.

Why is it planetu and not planet?

Planet is a masculine noun in Croatian. In the accusative singular, masculine nouns denoting inanimate objects often end in ‑(a) or ‑(u) depending on the word and style.

For planet, both forms can be encountered, but planetu is common and standard:

Nominative: planet (subject)
- Planet je velik. – The planet is big.
Accusative: planetu (direct object)
- Pomažemo planetu. – We help the planet.

So in your sentence, planetu is in the accusative because it is the direct object of pomažemo.

Can we drop da and just say Ona misli ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu?

Normally, no. Misliti in this sense almost always takes a da‑clause:

Ona misli da je to istina. – She thinks that this is true.
Ona misli da pomažemo planetu. – She thinks that we help the planet.

Using misliti directly with ako is not idiomatic:

✗ Ona misli ako recikliramo više...
sounds wrong or at best very odd.

So you want:

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.
or a rephrasing that keeps da:
Ona misli da stvarno pomažemo planetu ako recikliramo više.

What is the difference between ako and kad in a sentence like this?

Both can introduce clauses that look like if/when in English, but they differ:

ako usually means if (condition, possibility).
kad/kada usually means when (time).

In your sentence:

Ona misli da, ako recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.
Focus on the condition: if we recycle more.

If you said:

Ona misli da, kad recikliramo više, stvarno pomažemo planetu.

this would sound more like:

She thinks that, when we recycle more, we really help the planet
(more like “whenever we do it” – repeated situations in time).

Both are possible, but ako stresses the conditional nature more clearly: if this condition is met, then that result follows.