محطة القطار قريبة من البيت، لكن الطريق إلى المطار بعيد.

Breakdown of محطة القطار قريبة من البيت، لكن الطريق إلى المطار بعيد.

الى
to
طريق
road
من
from
بعيد
far
لكن
but
قطار
train
مطار
airport
قريب
near/close
بيت
house/home
محطة
station
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Arabic grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Arabic now

Questions & Answers about محطة القطار قريبة من البيت، لكن الطريق إلى المطار بعيد.

Why is there no verb meaning is/are in this sentence?

In Modern Standard Arabic, present-tense to be is usually omitted. So محطة القطار قريبة is a normal nominal sentence (a topic + a comment) meaning The train station is near… without an explicit is.
(Arabic can use كان for was/were, or يكون in more formal/explicit contexts, but not needed here.)

What is the grammatical structure of محطة القطار?

It’s an iḍāfa (genitive/construct) meaning the station of the trainthe train station:

  • محطة = the first noun (the “possessed” item)
  • القطار = the second noun (the “possessor/specifier”)

Key iḍāfa rules you’re seeing:

  • The first noun (محطة) typically has no ال.
  • Definiteness comes from the second noun: since القطار is definite, محطة القطار as a whole is definite.
Why is قريبة feminine, but بعيد masculine?

Adjectives agree with the noun they describe in gender:

  • محطة is grammatically feminine (many nouns ending in ة/ـة are feminine), so the adjective is feminine: قريبة.
  • الطريق is grammatically masculine in MSA, so the adjective is masculine: بعيد.
Why does قريبة not have الـ even though محطة القطار is definite?

Because قريبة here is the predicate (the “comment” part) of a nominal sentence. In Arabic, the predicate is often indefinite even when the subject is definite:

  • محطة القطار قريبة = The train station is (a) near (one). This is a very common pattern.
What do من and إلى mean here, and why are different prepositions used?
  • من البيت = from the house, but idiomatically with distance it often corresponds to English near/far from.
  • إلى المطار = to the airport (destination/direction).

So the patterns are:

  • قريب/بعيد من + place (near/far from)
  • طريق إلى + destination (a road to…)
Why is it الطريق إلى المطار and not an iḍāfa like طريق المطار?

Both can exist, but they’re not identical in feel:

  • الطريق إلى المطار = the road to the airport (explicit destination; very clear).
  • طريق المطار can mean the airport road (more like a labeled/associated road), but it’s less explicit about direction and can sound like a name/association.

Using إلى makes the meaning unambiguous: this road leads to the airport.

What does لكن do in the sentence, and why is there a comma before it?

لكن means but and introduces a contrast:

  • Train station: near
  • Road to airport: far

The comma reflects normal punctuation for a contrast in writing (similar to English). In Arabic you’ll also see ولكن (especially at the start of a new sentence/after a pause), which is slightly more formal/expanded.

How do I pronounce محطة and the final ة (tāʾ marbūṭa)?

محطة is typically pronounced:

  • In pause (end of a phrase): maḥaṭṭa (the ة sounds like -a)
  • If followed closely by another word in connected speech (especially in careful/formal reading): the ة can be pronounced -t, e.g. محطةُ القطارِmaḥaṭṭatu l-qiṭāri (with case endings).

In everyday MSA reading, many learners pronounce it as -a unless clearly linking.

Why is ال in القطار pronounced (not assimilated), but sometimes it isn’t?

Assimilation happens only with sun letters. ق is a moon letter, so الـ is pronounced fully:

  • القطار = al-qiṭār (not aqqiṭār)

Examples of assimilation (sun letter like ش):

  • الشمس = ash-shams (the l sound assimilates)
Are there supposed to be case endings here (like -u, -a, -i)?

In fully vowelled, formal MSA you could see case endings, roughly:

  • محطةُ القطارِ قريبةٌ من البيتِ، لكنَّ الطريقَ إلى المطارِ بعيدٌ.

In most modern writing, these endings are omitted (as in your sentence). Learners can read and write correctly without them, but they matter in very formal recitation/grammar study.

Why does لكن sometimes appear as لكنَّ with a shadda, and does that change anything?

Yes—there are two related forms:

  • لكن (no shadda) often functions like a simple conjunction but.
  • لكنَّ is one of the particles that (in full grammar) can affect the case of what follows (it behaves like إنَّ-type particles).

In unvowelled text, many people just write لكن even when the grammar would classify it as لكنَّ. The meaning in a sentence like this is still basically but.

Could the word order be changed, like starting with قريبة or بعيد?

The most neutral MSA order here is what you have: subject + predicate:

  • محطة القطار قريبة…
  • الطريق … بعيد

You can front adjectives or prepositional phrases for emphasis in some contexts, but it becomes stylistic/marked. For learners, the given order is the clearest and most common.