تصريح الدخول هنا.

In careful MSA, you can read it as taṣrīḥu d-dukhūli hunā.

A few helpful notes:

• تصريح = taṣrīḥu
• الدخول = ad-dukhūli in full pronunciation, but because د is a sun letter, the ل of الـ is not pronounced, so you hear d-dukhūli
• هنا = hunā

In normal reading and especially on signs, case endings are often not pronounced clearly, so learners may also hear something closer to taṣrīḥ ad-dukhūl hunā.

This is very normal in Arabic.

In the present tense, Arabic usually does not use a separate word for is/are. A sentence like this can be a nominal sentence:

• تصريح الدخول = the entry permit
• هنا = here

So the meaning is understood as The entry permit is here without saying a separate word for is.

If you wanted a past-tense version, then Arabic would use a verb such as كان.

It is an iḍāfa construction, often called a construct phrase.

That means:

• تصريح = permit / authorization
• الدخول = entry / entering

Together, تصريح الدخول means something like entry permit or literally permit of entry.

This is a very common Arabic pattern: noun + noun, where the second noun specifies the first.

Because it is the first word in an iḍāfa.

In Arabic, the first noun in an iḍāfa:

• does not take الـ
• does not take tanwīn

So even if the whole phrase is definite, you still do not write التصريح الدخول.

Correct:

• تصريح الدخول

Not correct:

• التصريح الدخول

Because in an iḍāfa, definiteness is determined by the second noun.

Since the second noun is الدخول with الـ, the whole phrase تصريح الدخول is definite.

So:

• تصريح الدخول = the entry permit
• تصريح دخول or fully vocalized تصريحُ دخولٍ would be more like an entry permit

This is a key rule of iḍāfa in Arabic.

الدخول is the maṣdar (verbal noun) of the verb دخل meaning to enter.

So الدخول means:

• entering
• entry
• admission

In English, we often turn this into a noun modifier, so تصريح الدخول becomes entry permit.

So even though Arabic literally has something like permit of entry, the natural English equivalent is usually entry permit.

If fully vocalized, the sentence is:

تَصْرِيحُ الدُّخُولِ هُنَا

Here is why:

• تصريحُ is nominative (-u) because it is the subject of the nominal sentence
• الدخولِ is genitive (-i) because it is the second term of the iḍāfa
• هنا is an indeclinable adverb, so it does not change like a regular noun

In everyday writing, these endings are usually not written.

It can work as either, depending on context.

As a full sentence:

• تصريح الدخول هنا = The entry permit is here

On a sign or notice:

• it may simply function as a short label, something like Entry permit here

Arabic signs often use very compact wording, so a short phrase can do the job without sounding incomplete.

هنا means here, and in this sentence it acts as the predicate of the nominal sentence.

So the structure is roughly:

• تصريح الدخول = subject
• هنا = predicate

That is why the sentence means that the permit is located here.

Yes, you can, but it changes the emphasis.

• تصريح الدخول هنا is a straightforward way to say The entry permit is here
• هنا تصريح الدخول puts more focus on here

So both are possible, but the original order is a natural neutral choice if you are simply identifying where the permit is.

Because د is one of the sun letters.

When الـ comes before a sun letter, the ل sound is assimilated into the next consonant. So:

• written: الدخول
• pronounced: ad-dukhūl or, in connected careful speech, d-dukhūli

This is a pronunciation rule only. The spelling still stays الدخول.