نضفت المطبخ ورتبت الاوضة قبل ما الضيوف يجوا.

A natural Egyptian pronunciation is:

naḍḍaft il-maṭbakh wi-rattabt il-ōḍa abl ma iḍ-ḍuyūf yigu

A rough English-style approximation:

nad-DAFT il-MAT-bakh wi rat-TABT il-OH-da abl ma id-doyOOF yi-GOO

A few sound notes:

• ج in Egyptian Arabic is usually a hard g, so يجوا sounds like yigu, not yiju.
• خ is the kh sound, like in Bach or loch.
• ض and ط are “heavy” consonants.

Because Arabic verbs usually already show the subject.

In this sentence:

• نضفت = I cleaned
• رتبت = I tidied / arranged

The ending -ت tells you the subject is I in the past tense, so you do not need أنا unless you want extra emphasis.

Here, -ت marks the first person singular past: I did.

So:

• نضفت = I cleaned
• رتبت = I arranged / tidied

This is very common in Egyptian Arabic past-tense verbs.

Because و means and, and in Arabic it is written attached to the following word.

So:

• ورتبت = and I tidied / and I arranged

In Egyptian speech, this و is often pronounced wi or just a very short w sound.

Because informal Egyptian writing often leaves out a lot of pronunciation detail, especially short vowels and sometimes even marks like shadda.

So although you see:

• نضفت
• رتبت

they are commonly pronounced more like:

• naḍḍaft
• rattabt

This is normal in colloquial writing. Learners often notice that spoken Egyptian is more detailed than the bare written form suggests.

قبل ما is a very common Egyptian way to say before when a verb follows.

So:

• قبل ما الضيوف يجوا = before the guests come / before the guests came

The ما here does not mean what. It is just part of this structure.

A useful contrast:

• قبل الأكل = before the food / before eating
• قبل ما ناكل = before we eat

Because after قبل ما, Egyptian Arabic often uses the non-past/present form for the action that had not happened yet at that point.

So Arabic says, literally, something closer to:

• I cleaned the kitchen and tidied the room before the guests come

But natural English usually shifts this to:

• before the guests came

So this is a good example where you should not translate word-for-word tense from Arabic into English.

Because الضيوف means the guests, which is plural, so the verb is plural too.

• يجي = he comes
• يجوا = they come

The ending -وا here shows they.

That is a major feature of Egyptian Arabic.

In Egyptian:

• ج is usually pronounced as a hard g

So:

• يجوا = yigu

In other varieties of Arabic, the same letter may sound more like j, but in Egyptian g is the normal pronunciation.

Because of sun-letter assimilation.

The word is written:

• الضيوف

But because ض is a sun letter, the l sound in ال is absorbed, and the next consonant is emphasized/doubled in pronunciation.

So it sounds like:

• iḍ-ḍuyūf

This is the same kind of pattern you see in words like:

• الشمس pronounced ish-shams

ضيوف is the plural of ضيف (guest), and it is a broken plural.

That means the plural is not made just by adding a regular ending. Instead, the internal shape of the word changes:

• ضيف = guest
• ضيوف = guests

Broken plurals are extremely common in Arabic, so this is a pattern worth getting used to.

No, أوضة / اوضة is an Egyptian colloquial word meaning room.

In Modern Standard Arabic, you would usually say:

• غرفة

So this sentence is clearly colloquial Egyptian, not Standard Arabic.

Also, in informal writing you may see:

• اوضة
• أوضة
• with the article: الاوضة or الأوضة

All of these are pointing to the same Egyptian word.

Yes, both are natural.

You can say:

• قبل ما الضيوف يجوا
• قبل ما يجوا الضيوف

Both mean the same thing: before the guests come/came.

The version with الضيوف first can feel a bit more explicit about the guests, while the version with the verb first may sound a little more flowing in conversation. In everyday Egyptian, both are fine.