انا عايز غدا دلوقتي.

A natural pronunciation is:

ana ʿāyez ghada dilwaʔti

A few sound notes:

• أنا = ana
• عايز = ʿāyez
  
  • The ع sound does not exist in English. Many learners just approximate it at first.
• غدا = ghada
  
  • غ is a throaty gh sound.
• دلوقتي = dilwaʔti or delwaʔti
  
  • The ء / ʔ is a quick stop, like the break in uh-oh.

You may also hear slightly different pronunciations depending on the speaker.

The sentence is built like this:

• أنا = subject pronoun
• عايز = wanting / wanting to have
• غدا = lunch
• دلوقتي = now

So the structure is basically:

I + wanting + lunch + now

In Egyptian Arabic, this is a very normal way to say I want lunch now. It does not need a present-tense am the way English would in a literal gloss.

In Egyptian Arabic, عايز is one of the most common everyday ways to say want.

It originally comes from a participle-like form, but for learners the important thing is this:

• أنا عايز... = I want...
• هو عايز... = he wants...

So even though it is not a simple English-style verb form, it functions very naturally as want in speech.

A more formal Arabic word would be أريد, but that belongs to Standard Arabic, not normal everyday Egyptian conversation.

You can sometimes leave it out in conversation if the context is clear:

• عايز غدا دلوقتي

But for a learner, keeping أنا is a good idea.

Why? Because عايز by itself does not clearly show person the way a fully conjugated verb would. Depending on context, عايز could mean I want or he wants. Saying أنا makes it unambiguous.

So:

• أنا عايز غدا دلوقتي = clearer
• عايز غدا دلوقتي = possible in context

Because عايز agrees with the speaker’s gender.

• A male speaker says: أنا عايز
• A female speaker says: أنا عايزة

So if the speaker is female, the sentence becomes:

أنا عايزة غدا دلوقتي

This agreement is very important in Egyptian Arabic.

That is a very common question.

Here, غدا means lunch.

Why the confusion?

• In Standard Arabic, غدًا can mean tomorrow
• But in Egyptian Arabic, tomorrow is usually بكرة
• So in an Egyptian sentence like this, غدا is understood as lunch

That is why context and dialect matter a lot.

In everyday Egyptian, many speakers would very naturally say:

أنا عايز الغدا دلوقتي

Meals often appear with ال in colloquial speech:

• الفطار = breakfast
• الغدا = lunch
• العشا = dinner

So the sentence without ال is understandable, but الغدا may sound more idiomatic in many situations.

Because that is a very natural position for now in Egyptian Arabic.

So:

أنا عايز غدا دلوقتي

sounds normal and straightforward.

Word order with adverbs is somewhat flexible, though. You could move دلوقتي earlier for emphasis, for example:

• أنا دلوقتي عايز غدا
• دلوقتي أنا عايز غدا

But the version with دلوقتي at the end is probably the easiest and most natural pattern for a learner to use.

Both are common in Egyptian Arabic, and both can mean want.

So you may hear either:

• أنا عايز غدا دلوقتي
• أنا عاوز غدا دلوقتي

The difference is mostly regional or personal pronunciation/style, not a big difference in meaning.

As a learner, it is enough to recognize both and use the one you hear most often in the variety of Egyptian Arabic you are studying.

It is natural as a plain statement, especially if you are talking to family or friends, or simply saying what you want.

But yes, it can sound direct depending on the situation. If you are speaking to a waiter, host, or someone you want to be polite with, you might soften it.

For example:

• لو سمحت، أنا عايز الغدا دلوقتي = Excuse me / please, I want lunch now
• ممكن الغدا دلوقتي؟ = Could I have lunch now?

So the original sentence is fine grammatically, but politeness in real conversation may call for extra words like لو سمحت or ممكن.