Breakdown of Wanneer my tante laat kom, vra my oom of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
Questions & Answers about Wanneer my tante laat kom, vra my oom of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
Why is it laat kom here, not kom laat?
Because wanneer introduces a subordinate clause, and in Afrikaans the conjugated verb usually goes to the end of that clause.
So:
- Main clause word order: My tante kom laat.
- Subordinate clause word order: Wanneer my tante laat kom, ...
Here laat means late, and kom is the verb come / arrive.
So laat kom means come late / arrive late.
Why does the next part say vra my oom instead of my oom vra?
Afrikaans is a verb-second language in main clauses. That means the conjugated verb normally comes in the second position.
Since the sentence starts with the whole subordinate clause:
that first chunk takes up the first position. So the verb in the main clause must come next:
- vra my oom
Compare:
- My oom vra of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
- Wanneer my tante laat kom, vra my oom of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
So the subject my oom moves after the verb because something else is in first position.
What exactly does of mean here?
Why is it of die pot nog warm genoeg is and not of is die pot nog warm genoeg?
What does nog mean in this sentence?
Why is it warm genoeg and not genoeg warm?
Is pot really just pot in Afrikaans too?
Why is there no change in the verb for my tante, my oom, or die pot?
Afrikaans verbs are much simpler than English verbs. They usually do not change form depending on the subject.
For example, with kom:
- Ek kom
- Jy kom
- Hy kom
- Ons kom
And with vra:
- Ek vra
- My oom vra
And with is, the form is also the same:
- Ek is
- Hy is
- Die pot is
So unlike English, you do not need to learn forms like come/comes or ask/asks.
Could I also use as instead of wanneer here?
Does laat kom literally mean let come?
Not in this sentence.
Although laat can be a verb meaning let / allow / make, here it is not functioning that way. Here laat is the adverb meaning late.
So:
- my tante laat kom = my aunt comes late / arrives late
Compare that with a different use:
- Ek laat hom kom. = I let him come / I make him come.
So the same word laat can have different functions, and context tells you which one it is.
How would the sentence look if the subordinate clause came after the main clause?
It would look like this:
Or, if you want the timing clause attached more naturally to the asking event:
- My oom vra, wanneer my tante laat kom, of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
But the original sentence is very useful because it shows two important patterns:
- Subordinate clause first: Wanneer my tante laat kom, ...
- Main clause inversion after that: vra my oom ...
So the original word order is especially good for learning Afrikaans sentence structure.
Is wanneer my tante laat kom a complete clause by itself?
Yes, it is a complete subordinate clause.
It has:
So it is grammatically complete, but it depends on the main clause for the full sentence.
The full structure is:
Wanneer my tante laat kom,
subordinate clausevra my oom of die pot nog warm genoeg is.
main clause + embedded indirect question
This sentence is a good example of how Afrikaans can stack clauses neatly while keeping the verb at the end in subordinate structures.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning AfrikaansMaster Afrikaans — from Wanneer my tante laat kom, vra my oom of die pot nog warm genoeg is to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions