Sarjan toinen kausi osoittautui pettymykseksi huonon käsikirjoituksen vuoksi.

Questions & Answers about Sarjan toinen kausi osoittautui pettymykseksi huonon käsikirjoituksen vuoksi.

Why is pettymykseksi in the translative case instead of the partitive or nominative?
This is triggered by the verb osoittautua (to turn out to be). In Finnish, verbs describing a transformation, a role, or a newly revealed state usually require the translative case (the -ksi ending). The season was revealed as a disappointment.
Could I use takia instead of vuoksi here, and what is the difference?
Yes, you could say huonon käsikirjoituksen takia. Both are postpositions meaning because of or due to, and both require the preceding phrase to be in the genitive case. Vuoksi is slightly more formal and common in written language, whereas takia is heavily used in both speech and writing.
How is the verb osoittautua related to the more common verb osoittaa?
Osoittautua (to turn out to be) is a reflexive derivative of osoittaa (to point, to show). The -utua ending often indicates that the action happens to the subject itself without an outside object. Instead of showing something else to the world, the subject reveals its own nature.
Why does the adjective huono take the -n ending in huonon käsikirjoituksen?
The postposition vuoksi requires the noun phrase before it to be in the genitive case. In Finnish, adjectives must agree in case with the noun they modify. Since käsikirjoitus (script) becomes käsikirjoituksen, the adjective huono (bad) must also take the genitive -n ending to match.

Learn Sarjan toinen kausi osoittautui pettymykseksi huonon käsikirjoituksen vuoksi and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free