Breakdown of Tietääkseni me emme kiistele tästä sukutarinasta.
tämä
this
me
we
ei
no / not (en, et, ei, emme, ette, eivät)
tietääkseni
as far as I know
kiistellä
to argue (dispute, debate)
sukutarina
family story
Questions & Answers about Tietääkseni me emme kiistele tästä sukutarinasta.
How is the word tietääkseni built, and how does it translate to "as far as I know"?
It is formed using the first infinitive of the verb tietää (to know), followed by the translative marker -kse-, and the first-person singular possessive suffix -ni (my). This structure literally translates to something like "for my knowing," but it functions as a fixed sentence adverb meaning "as far as I know" or "to my knowledge."
Why are the words for "this family story" in the elative case (tästä sukutarinasta)?
The verb kiistellä (to argue, debate, or dispute) requires the elative case (-sta/-stä) to express what the argument is about. Therefore, both the pronoun tämä and the noun sukutarina take the elative endings.
How does kiistellä differ from the more common word riidellä (to argue/fight)?
Kiistellä generally means to debate or dispute a specific issue, often intellectually or formally, and it derives from the noun kiista (a dispute). Riidellä usually implies quarreling, bickering, or having a more emotional, interpersonal fight.
Is it strictly necessary to include the pronoun me in this sentence?
No, you could simply say Tietääkseni emme kiistele... In Finnish, first and second person pronouns (minä, sinä, me, te) can usually be dropped because the verb (in this case, the negative verb emme) already makes the subject perfectly clear. Including me just adds a slight bit of emphasis.
Learn Tietääkseni me emme kiistele tästä sukutarinasta and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free