Breakdown of He eivät lisänneet humalaa tähän kattilaan mäskiä.
tämä
this
he
they
ei
no / not (en, et, ei, emme, ette, eivät)
kattila
pot (saucepan)
lisätä
to add
mäski
the mash
humala
the hops
Questions & Answers about He eivät lisänneet humalaa tähän kattilaan mäskiä.
How does the phrase tähän kattilaan mäskiä work grammatically?
This is the core of the current lesson! In Finnish, when you have a container (like kattila) holding a substance (like mäski), the substance is put into the partitive case (mäskiä) and acts as a modifier. Even when the container changes case—here it is in the illative (kattilaan) because of the verb—the substance stays locked in the uninflected partitive.
Why is kattila in the illative case (kattilaan)?
The verb lisätä (to add) requires its target destination to be in the illative case (the 'into' form). It answers 'into what' the hops were added.
Is humalaa in the partitive case because the sentence is negative?
Yes, but it would actually be in the partitive even if the sentence were positive! In negative sentences, the direct object is always partitive. However, humala (hops) is used here as an uncountable mass noun, so a positive sentence would also use the partitive: He lisäsivät humalaa (They added some hops).
I recognize the verb lisätä, but why is it written as lisänneet here?
Because this is a negative past tense sentence, the main verb takes the active past participle form. For lisätä (a type 4 verb), the singular past participle is lisännyt. Since the subject he is plural, the participle must also agree and become plural, which changes the -nnyt ending to -nneet.
Learn He eivät lisänneet humalaa tähän kattilaan mäskiä and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free