Breakdown of Sukupuutto tuhoaa koko ravintoketjun.
koko
whole
tuhota
to destroy
ravintoketju
food chain
sukupuutto
extinction
Questions & Answers about Sukupuutto tuhoaa koko ravintoketjun.
Why is the object ravintoketjun in the genitive-looking accusative case instead of the partitive?
The verb tuhoaa (destroys) takes a total object here because the action is viewed as a complete event affecting the whole object. Using the partitive case (ravintoketjua) would imply an ongoing, incomplete process, translating more like "is destroying the food chain" rather than a definitive statement of fact.
Why does koko stay in its basic form when the noun it modifies (ravintoketjun) has an -n ending?
The word koko (entire/whole) is an exception to the normal Finnish rule where modifiers must agree with the case of their nouns. It is completely indeclinable, meaning it never changes form or takes case endings.
How could I add a phrase to the beginning to say "From nature's perspective, extinction..." using this lesson's grammar?
You would take the word for nature (luonto), put it into the genitive case (luonnon), and place it before the postposition kannalta. The sentence would be: Luonnon kannalta sukupuutto tuhoaa koko ravintoketjun.
How is the vocabulary word sukupuutto (extinction) constructed?
It is a compound of suku (which can mean family, generation, or biological species) and puutto. The noun puutto is derived from the verb puuttua (to lack, to be missing). So, it literally translates to the "lack of a species."
Learn Sukupuutto tuhoaa koko ravintoketjun and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free