Onko maatalous uhka monimuotoisuuden kannalta?

Questions & Answers about Onko maatalous uhka monimuotoisuuden kannalta?

How does the postposition kannalta work in this sentence?
Kannalta is a postposition meaning "in terms of" or "from the perspective of." It requires the preceding word to be in the genitive case, which is why we see monimuotoisuuden instead of the nominative monimuotoisuus. Literally, it is the ablative case ("from") of the noun kanta (base, stance, or point of view).
The lesson mentions kannalta can take a possessive suffix. Could we use kannaltaan here?
Not without changing the meaning. If you used kannaltaan, the possessive suffix would reflect back to the subject of the sentence, maatalous (agriculture). That would change the meaning to "Is agriculture a threat from its own perspective?" rather than from the perspective of biodiversity.
The word monimuotoisuuden looks quite long. What are its building blocks?
It is the genitive form of monimuotoisuus (biodiversity or complexity). This noun is a compound built from moni (many) and muoto (form), plus the suffix -isuus. This suffix is very useful to know at this level: it turns an adjective into a noun describing a state or quality, similar to "-ity" or "-ness" in English.
Both maatalous and uhka are in the nominative case. Why isn't uhka in the partitive here?
In Finnish, sentences with the verb olla typically use the nominative case for both the subject (maatalous) and the complement (uhka) when identifying what something is. You would only use the partitive for the complement if it were an uncountable mass noun or an adjective describing the subject, but uhka (a threat) is treated as a countable, abstract noun here.

Learn Onko maatalous uhka monimuotoisuuden kannalta and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free