Breakdown of Onko maatalous uhka monimuotoisuuden kannalta?
olla
to be
uhka
threat
kannalta
from the perspective of
monimuotoisuus
biodiversity
Questions & Answers about Onko maatalous uhka monimuotoisuuden kannalta?
How does the postposition kannalta work in this sentence?
Kannalta is a postposition meaning "in terms of" or "from the perspective of." It requires the preceding word to be in the genitive case, which is why we see monimuotoisuuden instead of the nominative monimuotoisuus. Literally, it is the ablative case ("from") of the noun kanta (base, stance, or point of view).
The lesson mentions kannalta can take a possessive suffix. Could we use kannaltaan here?
Not without changing the meaning. If you used kannaltaan, the possessive suffix would reflect back to the subject of the sentence, maatalous (agriculture). That would change the meaning to "Is agriculture a threat from its own perspective?" rather than from the perspective of biodiversity.
The word monimuotoisuuden looks quite long. What are its building blocks?
It is the genitive form of monimuotoisuus (biodiversity or complexity). This noun is a compound built from moni (many) and muoto (form), plus the suffix -isuus. This suffix is very useful to know at this level: it turns an adjective into a noun describing a state or quality, similar to "-ity" or "-ness" in English.
Both maatalous and uhka are in the nominative case. Why isn't uhka in the partitive here?