Question 1

Why is the word for afford/resources in the partitive case (varaa) here?

Accepted Answer

This sentence uses the "possessive resource" structure. When expressing that someone has an abstract, uncountable resource (like money or time) to do something, Finnish uses the possessive construction (adessive sinulla + on) and puts the resource noun in the partitive. Here, varaa represents the financial means to do something.

Question 2

Why is the object tuo kallis merkkivaate in the basic nominative form, rather than the genitive (tuon kalliin merkkivaatteen)?

Accepted Answer

Because the main clause (onko sinulla varaa) is a possessive sentence, which means it lacks a grammatical subject in the nominative case. When an infinitive (ostaa) is the main action in a subjectless clause like this (or in a necessity sentence like minun täytyy), its total object takes the basic nominative form instead of the genitive.

Question 3

What is the literal breakdown of the compound word merkkivaate?

Accepted Answer

It is made up of merkki (mark, sign, or brand) and vaate (garment or piece of clothing). In everyday Finnish, a merkkivaate specifically refers to brand-name or designer clothing.

Question 4

If I wanted to leave out the verb ostaa and just ask "Can you afford that expensive designer garment?", how would the grammar change?

Accepted Answer

You would drop the infinitive and put the target noun phrase into the illative case: Onko sinulla varaa tuohon kalliiseen merkkivaatteeseen? But when you include an action verb like ostaa, you simply use its basic 1st infinitive form as shown in this sentence.

Onko sinulla varaa ostaa tuo kallis merkkivaate?

Breakdown of Onko sinulla varaa ostaa tuo kallis merkkivaate?

Questions & Answers about Onko sinulla varaa ostaa tuo kallis merkkivaate?

Learn Onko sinulla varaa ostaa tuo kallis merkkivaate and more in Finnish