Word
Elokuva ei ollut ainoastaan hänen läpimurtonsa, vaan myös todellinen mestariteos.
Meaning
The film was not only his breakthrough but also a true masterpiece.
Part of speech
sentence
Pronunciation
Course
Breakdown of Elokuva ei ollut ainoastaan hänen läpimurtonsa, vaan myös todellinen mestariteos.
olla
to be
myös
also
ei
no / not (en, et, ei, emme, ette, eivät)
elokuva
movie
Questions & Answers about Elokuva ei ollut ainoastaan hänen läpimurtonsa, vaan myös todellinen mestariteos.
Why is ollut placed between ei and ainoastaan instead of keeping the conjunction phrase together?
In Finnish, the negative verb ei and the main verb ollut strongly prefer to stay together. While the correlative structure is ei ainoastaan ... vaan myös, the verb naturally slips into the middle of the first half. This actually matches the English word order 'was not only' quite perfectly.
The sentence starts with the negative verb ei ollut, so why are the nouns läpimurto and mestariteos in the nominative case instead of the partitive?
Even though the sentence contains ei ollut (was not), the overall meaning is affirmative: the film actually was both a breakthrough and a masterpiece. Because the ei ainoastaan ... vaan myös structure confirms both facts rather than denying them, the predicative nouns stay in the nominative case just as they would in a standard affirmative sentence.
Why do we need the suffix -nsa on läpimurtonsa when the sentence already includes the word hänen?
In standard written Finnish, whenever you use a third-person possessive pronoun like hänen (his/her) or heidän (their), you must also add the matching possessive suffix to the noun. It is a strict grammatical rule for standard language, even though in relaxed spoken Finnish people often drop the suffix and just say hänen läpimurto.
What is the difference between and in the compound word ?