Breakdown of Sinullahan on kivulias rakko, mutta juokset kuitenkin?
olla
to be
sinä
you
mutta
but
juosta
to run
Questions & Answers about Sinullahan on kivulias rakko, mutta juokset kuitenkin?
How does kuitenkin fit into this sentence, and could I use silti instead?
In this sentence, kuitenkin translates best to 'anyway' or 'however'—it highlights that you are running despite the painful blister. You could absolutely swap it for silti (mutta juokset silti?) to mean 'nevertheless' or 'still'. They are virtually interchangeable when expressing this kind of direct contrast.
Why is the -han ending attached to sinulla?
The clitic -han (or -hän) is used to refer to shared knowledge or to soften a statement the listener already knows. Here, sinullahan on translates roughly to 'you have... as we both know' or 'you have... you know'. The speaker is pointing out an established fact before questioning the decision to run.
This sentence ends in a question mark, but it doesn't use a question word or the -ko ending. Is that correct?
Yes! Just like in English, spoken Finnish often turns a standard statement into a question using tone of voice and context. The speaker is expressing surprise ('...but you will run anyway?'). If you wanted to use formal question grammar, you would add the question clitic to the verb and say juoksetko kuitenkin?.
Why is kivulias rakko in the basic nominative case rather than the partitive?
This sentence uses the Finnish 'have' structure (sinulla on). In this structure, the thing you have acts grammatically like the subject. Because a blister (rakko) is a whole, individual, countable thing, it stays in the nominative case. If you had something uncountable, like water or time, it would take the partitive.