Questions & Answers about Me syömme koko kakun.
Why does the word for cake end in -n (kakun) instead of being in the partitive (kakkua)?
This is the main point of this lesson! Adding the -n ending shows that the action is complete and affects the entire object. If you used the partitive (kakkua), it would mean 'We are eating some cake' or 'We are in the process of eating the cake'. Because we are eating the whole thing to completion, the object takes the -n ending.
The translation says 'will eat', but isn't syömme the present tense for 'we eat'?
Yes! Finnish doesn't have a separate future tense. You usually understand it's a future action from the context or the object. Because the object kakun has the total object -n ending, it shows a completed action. Expressing that we eat the whole cake to completion naturally implies it is something we will do, so it translates to the English future tense.
If kakun has an -n ending, why doesn't koko (whole) get one too?
Normally, descriptive words take the same endings as the noun they describe. However, koko is a special exception. It is an 'indeclinable' word, which simply means it never changes its shape, no matter what grammatical ending the following noun has.
Why does kakun only have one 'k' in the middle, when the basic dictionary word for cake is kakku?