Naisella ei ole kuittia.

Questions & Answers about Naisella ei ole kuittia.

Why does the word for woman, nainen, change to naisella here?
Words ending in -nen usually change the -nen to -se- before adding an ending. So, nainen becomes the stem naise-. Then we add the -lla ending to indicate who has something (literally "on the woman").
Why does the sentence use ole instead of on?
When you say someone has something, you use on (for example, Naisella on...). But to say someone does not have something, the verb changes to ei ole. The word ei does the negating, and ole is the special form of the "to be" verb used right after it.
Why is the word for receipt kuittia instead of the dictionary form kuitti?
Because the woman does not have it! In Finnish, when you state that someone does not have something, the thing they are lacking must be put into the partitive case. Here, we add the partitive ending -a to kuitti to get kuittia.
Is the word order strictly fixed for this type of sentence?
Yes, this is the standard pattern for negative possession. You start with the person (with the -lla or -llä ending, like Naisella), follow it with ei ole, and end with the thing they don't have in the partitive case (kuittia).

Learn Naisella ei ole kuittia and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free