Questions & Answers about Onko sinulla ongelma?
Why does this sentence start with Onko instead of the word for "you"?
To turn a statement into a yes/no question, Finnish moves the main verb to the front and adds the question particle -ko. The statement "You have a problem" is Sinulla on ongelma. To ask "Do you have a problem?", on moves to the beginning and becomes Onko.
How does sinulla mean "you have" here?
Finnish doesn't have a direct verb for "to have". Instead, it uses a structure that literally translates to "at someone is something." The pronoun sinä (you) gets the -lla ending to become sinulla (at you). So, the sentence literally asks "Is at you a problem?".
If the sentence is about "you", why is the verb on (is) instead of olet (are)?
In the Finnish "have" structure, the verb is always the third-person singular on. This is because the owner isn't the grammatical subject. The actual subject is the thing being owned. Think of it as "Is a problem at you?" rather than "Are you having a problem?".
Does ongelma need any special case ending here?
No, because it is a positive question about a single, countable thing, so we just use the basic dictionary form (nominative case). If we were making a negative sentence like "I don't have a problem," it would need the partitive case ending: ongelmaa.
Learn Onko sinulla ongelma and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free