Question 1

Why do we use the past subjunctive انداخته باشد here instead of the present subjunctive?

Accepted Answer

The verb باعث شدن (to cause) requires its following که (that) clause to be in the subjunctive. We use the past subjunctive (انداخته باشد) instead of the present subjunctive because the resulting action (disabling the power grid) is already a completed, past event. It translates roughly to 'caused the pylon to have disabled the power grid.'

Question 2

How does the phrase از کار انداخته باشد mean 'to disable'?

Accepted Answer

It comes from the compound verb از کار انداختن, which literally translates to 'to throw out of work.' This is a very common Farsi idiom used to mean 'to disable,' 'to break,' or 'to put out of commission.'

Question 3

شاید (perhaps) usually takes a subjunctive verb. Why is the main verb باعث شد in the simple past?

Accepted Answer

While شاید often takes the subjunctive for present or future possibilities, when you are guessing about a finished event in the past, you can just use the simple past tense. Here, شاید ... باعث شد simply means 'maybe it caused...'. The subjunctive on the second verb is triggered by the causation structure باعث شد که, not by شاید.

Question 4

What is the exact subject of the second clause, and how does را help us figure that out?

Accepted Answer

The subject of the که clause is دکل (the pylon). Because شبکه‌ی برق (the power grid) is followed by the direct object marker را, we know the power grid is the thing being disabled. Even though دکل and شبکه‌ی برق are next to each other in the sentence, را clearly marks who is doing what to whom.

شاید طوفان باعث شد که دکل شبکه‌ی برق را از کار انداخته باشد.

Breakdown of شاید طوفان باعث شد که دکل شبکه‌ی برق را از کار انداخته باشد.

Questions & Answers about شاید طوفان باعث شد که دکل شبکه‌ی برق را از کار انداخته باشد.

Learn شاید طوفان باعث شد که دکل شبکه‌ی برق را از کار انداخته باشد and more in Farsi