Breakdown of این سلسله تا زمانی که یکپارچه بود، به زوال نرسید.
این
this
بودنbudan
to be
بهbe
to
رسیدنrasidan
to arrive
تا زمانی کهtâ zamâni ke
as long as / so long as
سلسلهselseleh
dynasty
یکپارچهyekpârche
unified / integrated
زوالzavâl
decline / downfall
Questions & Answers about این سلسله تا زمانی که یکپارچه بود، به زوال نرسید.
Why do we use the simple past indicative bud after tâ zamâni ke instead of a subjunctive verb?
The conjunction tâ zamâni ke (as long as) takes indicative tenses when it describes a factual, established duration rather than a hypothetical condition. Since the dynasty was actually unified in the past, we use the simple past bud to state that historical fact.
The English translation says "did not fall into decline," but what does be zavâl narasid literally mean?
Literally, it means "did not reach decline." The verb rasidan (to reach) is often used with the preposition be (to) to express entering a new state or condition, just like "falling into" or "coming to" in English.
What is the literal breakdown of the word yekpârche?
It is a compound of yek (one) and pârche (piece, or fabric). Calling a dynasty "one piece" is the standard Farsi way to describe something as unified, monolithic, or unbroken.
Why is in selsele placed before tâ zamâni ke instead of inside the time clause?
Farsi allows flexible word order for emphasis. Placing in selsele (this dynasty) at the very beginning makes it the main topic for the entire sentence. You could also say tâ zamâni ke in selsele yekpârche bud, which is equally correct but slightly shifts the initial focus to the timeframe.
Learn این سلسله تا زمانی که یکپارچه بود، به زوال نرسید and more in Farsi
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free