فهمیدن مشکل شناختی کودک سخت است، اما حل کردنش ممکن است.

Questions & Answers about فهمیدن مشکل شناختی کودک سخت است، اما حل کردنش ممکن است.

Why is the enclitic ـش (-ash) attached to the infinitive کردن (kardan) in حل کردنش?
حل کردن (hal kardan) is an infinitive acting as a verbal noun (solving). Instead of using a separate pronoun with an Ezafe, like حل کردنِ آن (hal kardan-e aan), Farsi seamlessly attaches the possessive enclitic ـش (-ash) to express the logical direct object. Literally, it translates to 'the solving of it.'
Can you break down the Ezafe chain in فهمیدن مشکل شناختی کودک?
The chain links the verbal noun all the way to the possessor: فهمیدنِ (fahmidan-e, understanding of) + مشکلِ (moshkel-e, problem of) + شناختیِ (shenaxti-ye, cognitive) + کودک (kudak, child). Notice that the adjective شناختی comes immediately after the noun it describes, followed by the final possessor.
How is the adjective شناختی (shenaxti) formed?
It is derived from the past stem of شناختن (shenaxtan, to know or recognize). The noun شناخت (shenaxt) means 'cognition' or 'knowledge', and adding the suffix ـی (-i) turns it into the relational adjective 'cognitive'.
Could this sentence be built using the subjunctive instead of infinitives?
Yes, Farsi often uses an impersonal clause with the subjunctive for general statements. You could rephrase it as سخت است که مشکل... را بفهمیم (saxt ast ke moshkel... ra befahmim - it is hard that we understand...). However, using infinitives as nouns, as seen in this sentence, is very natural and common in formal or written Farsi.

Learn فهمیدن مشکل شناختی کودک سخت است، اما حل کردنش ممکن است and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free