زیردریایی غول‌پیکر اتمی دیگر در اقیانوس نیست.

Questions & Answers about زیردریایی غول‌پیکر اتمی دیگر در اقیانوس نیست.

Why does غول‌پیکر (gigantic) come before اتمی (nuclear) in this Ezafe chain, and could we swap them?
In Farsi, when chaining adjectives with the Ezafe, qualitative adjectives like size (غول‌پیکر) typically precede classifying or relational adjectives like type or power source (اتمی). If you swapped them, it would sound unnatural, much like saying 'a nuclear gigantic submarine' in English instead of 'a gigantic nuclear submarine'.
How is the Ezafe pronounced after زیردریایی since it ends in a vowel?
Because زیردریایی ends in the vowel sound 'ee' (the letter ی), you must add a 'y' consonant sound to bridge the vowels. So the first link in the chain is pronounced zir-daryayi-ye, not just zir-daryayi-e. You would do the exact same thing if you added an Ezafe after اتمی.
Wait, doesn't دیگر usually mean 'other'? How do we know it means 'no longer' here?
When دیگر is connected to a noun via an Ezafe (like زیردریاییِ دیگر), it acts as an adjective meaning 'other'. However, here it stands outside the Ezafe chain as an adverb. Because the sentence's verb is negative (نیست), an independent دیگر translates to 'no longer' or 'not anymore'.
Is there an Ezafe between دیگر and در?
No. The Ezafe chain modifying the submarine ends at اتمی. The word دیگر is functioning as an adverb here, so it does not take an Ezafe to connect to the prepositional phrase در اقیانوس.

Learn زیردریایی غول‌پیکر اتمی دیگر در اقیانوس نیست and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free