Question 1

Why use mobâderat be instead of just saying اعتصاب کردند (they struck)?

Accepted Answer

Using mobâderat be (engaging in / undertaking) elevates the register and puts the focus heavily on the action of the strike itself. While اعتصاب کردند simply means "they struck," مبادرت به اعتصاب کردند sounds much more official, journalistic, or formal, which is typical for news reports about organized actions like a legal strike.

Question 2

Could we use eqdâm be instead of mobâderat be in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

Yes, اقدام به (eqdâm be) would work perfectly here and has a very similar formal meaning ("took action to" or "proceeded to"). مبادرت (mobâderat) often carries a slight nuance of embarking on a significant or deliberate undertaking, making it a very natural fit for initiating a major event like a strike.

Question 3

Is there an Ezafe connecting mobâderat to اعتصاب ('etesâb)?

Accepted Answer

No, because the preposition به (be) links the action to the noun, doing the job of connecting them instead of an Ezafe. However, there is an unseen Ezafe connecting the noun اعتصاب ('etesâb) to its adjective قانونی (qânuni), which is pronounced as 'etesâb-e qânuni (legal strike).

Question 4

Why use the plural کارگران (kârgarân) here rather than the standard کارگرها (kârgarhâ)?

Accepted Answer

کارگران uses the animate plural suffix ان- (-ân). While ها- (-hâ) is universal and much more common in everyday speech, -ân is frequently used for groups of people in formal, written, or journalistic contexts. Because this sentence uses the highly formal mobâderat be construction, kârgarân matches the official tone perfectly.

کارگران مبادرت به اعتصاب قانونی کردند.

Breakdown of کارگران مبادرت به اعتصاب قانونی کردند.

Questions & Answers about کارگران مبادرت به اعتصاب قانونی کردند.

Learn کارگران مبادرت به اعتصاب قانونی کردند and more in Farsi