ما به این یقین رسیدیم که مذاکرات به بن‌بست رسید.

Questions & Answers about ما به این یقین رسیدیم که مذاکرات به بن‌بست رسید.

This sentence uses the verb رسیدن twice. How does it work as a light verb here if no one is physically arriving anywhere?
In formal Farsi, رسیدن is often used to show the culmination of a process or reaching an abstract state. By combining the preposition به (to), a noun like یقین (certainty) or بن‌بست (deadlock), and رسیدن, you create compound verbs. Here, به یقین رسیدن and به بن‌بست رسیدن figuratively mean achieving that final condition.
The English translation says "the certainty," but the Farsi uses این (this) before یقین. Why is that?
When a noun is followed by an explanatory clause starting with که (that), Farsi often uses a demonstrative word like این (this) or آن (that) right before the noun. It acts as a pointer to the upcoming explanation. Literally, the structure reads as: We reached this certainty: that the negotiations...
The word مذاکرات (negotiations) is plural. Why does it take the singular verb رسید instead of the plural رسیدند?
مذاکرات is an inanimate plural subject (things, not people). In Farsi, inanimate plural subjects usually take a singular third-person verb. While using a plural verb isn't strictly wrong, the singular verb is much more natural and common, especially in formal or journalistic contexts.
What are the root parts of the word بن‌بست (deadlock)?
It is a descriptive compound noun made of بن (root or base) and بست (the past stem of بستن, meaning to close or tie). Together, a closed base perfectly describes a physical dead end in a street, or a metaphorical deadlock in negotiations where no further progress can be made.

Learn ما به این یقین رسیدیم که مذاکرات به بن‌بست رسید and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free