Questions & Answers about این مجسمه اصلی است یا تقلبی؟
We are currently learning about the indefinite -i. Are the -i endings on اصلی and تقلبی examples of that indefinite suffix?
No, though it is a very common trap! Because you just learned about the indefinite -i (like in یک کتابی / yek ketabi for "a certain book"), it is easy to see -i everywhere. However, the -i on اصلی (asli) and تقلبی (taghallobi) is actually the adjective-forming suffix. It turns the nouns اصل (asl - origin or root) and تقلب (taghallob - fraud) into the adjectives "authentic" and "fake."
Should there be an ezafe (the connecting "e" sound) between مجسمه and اصلی?
No ezafe is needed here because اصلی (asli) is the predicate of the sentence, not an attached adjective. The sentence literally says "This statue is authentic." If you wanted to say "this authentic statue" as a single noun phrase, you would use the ezafe: این مجسمهٔ اصلی (in mojasame-ye asli). Here, the presence of the verb است (ast) keeps them grammatically separate.
What is the root of the word تقلبی (taghallobi)?
The root is the noun تقلب (taghallob), which means "cheating," "fraud," or "forgery." By adding the -i suffix, it becomes an adjective meaning "counterfeit" or "fake." You will also often hear تقلب used in school settings to mean "cheating on a test."
How would a native speaker say this sentence in casual, everyday conversation?