پدر من یک کلکسیونی از سکه‌های باستانی دارد.

Questions & Answers about پدر من یک کلکسیونی از سکه‌های باستانی دارد.

Why do we need both yek before the noun and the -i suffix at the end of koleksion?
This structure creates 'indefinite specificity.' While either yek or -i alone can just mean 'a' or 'an,' combining them signals that you are talking about a specific, particular thing that you just aren't naming or identifying further for the listener. That is why it translates well to 'a certain collection.'
Why does the sentence use the preposition az (from) instead of an Ezafe to say 'collection of coins'?
In Farsi, when you talk about a group, container, or collection made up of multiple items, it is standard to use az (from/of). Saying yek koleksioni az sekkeh-ha translates literally to 'a collection from coins,' which is the most natural way to express this concept.
Why is the Ezafe pronounced as -ye in sekkeh-ha-ye bastani?
The plural suffix -ha ends in the long vowel sound 'a'. Whenever a word ends in a vowel (like a, u, or i), the Ezafe connector becomes -ye instead of just -e to prevent two vowel sounds from crashing into each other.
If the whole phrase is 'a collection of ancient coins', why doesn't the indefinite -i go at the very end after the adjective?
The indefinite -i attaches directly to the head noun that is being counted or specified, which is koleksion. The phrase az sekkeh-ha-ye bastani is a separate prepositional phrase describing what the collection is made of, so the suffix must stick to the core noun before the preposition.

Learn پدر من یک کلکسیونی از سکه‌های باستانی دارد and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free