C1 Text: Clarice Lispector Passage | Portuguese (Brazil) Grammar

Clarice Lispector (1920–1977) writes a Portuguese that deliberately breaks the ordinary rules of syntax. Her sentences fragment, repeat, double back, and end where you expect them to continue; she piles up abstract nouns (o ser, a coisa, o instante) and stretches verbs of being into philosophy. Because she is still under copyright, the passage below is not a genuine quotation. It is an original text written in the style of Clarice Lispector, composed for this lesson to illustrate her characteristic grammar. Reading her — and pastiches like this one — trains a crucial C1 skill: tolerating sentences that are intentionally marked, non-canonical, even ungrammatical by ordinary standards, and reading them for effect rather than for textbook correctness.

💡

The passage below is an original pastiche, not a real Clarice Lispector quotation. Use it to study her grammatical mannerisms; do not cite it as her words.

The text (original, in the style of Clarice Lispector)

É de manhã e eu existo. Isso já é quase demais.

It is morning and I exist. That is already almost too much.

A coisa está aqui, na mesa, e não tem nome. Ou tem, mas o nome não a alcança.

The thing is here, on the table, and has no name. Or it has one, but the name does not reach it.

Eu queria dizer o que sinto. Mas o que sinto não cabe na palavra sentir.

I wanted to say what I feel. But what I feel does not fit in the word 'to feel.'

O instante. Apenas o instante. Antes dele não havia nada, e depois dele também não há.

The instant. Only the instant. Before it there was nothing, and after it too there is nothing.

Ser é isto: estar de repente diante de uma maçã e não saber se sou eu que a vejo ou ela que me inventa.

To be is this: to be suddenly before an apple and not know whether it is I who see it or it that invents me.

Tenho medo. Tenho medo do tamanho do silêncio. O silêncio é grande como o mundo, e eu, pequena.

I am afraid. I am afraid of the size of the silence. The silence is as big as the world, and I, small.

Read aloud, it does not flow like ordinary prose. It stops, restarts, contradicts itself. That friction is the style.

Sentence fragments: grammar deliberately incomplete

Ordinary Portuguese, like English, expects a finite verb in every sentence. Clarice routinely drops it. O instante. Apenas o instante. are noun phrases standing alone as sentences — fragments, with no verb at all. In a learner's composition this would be marked wrong; here it is a stylistic device, isolating a single concept so it hangs in the air.

O instante. Apenas o instante.

The instant. Only the instant. (verbless fragments — the concept isolated)

O silêncio é grande como o mundo, e eu, pequena.

The silence is as big as the world, and I, small. (the second clause drops the verb 'sou' — gapping)

In e eu, pequena, the verb sou is gapped — understood from the previous clause but not repeated. English does the same ("the silence is huge, and I, small"), but it feels far more marked, more literary, in both languages. Recognizing the missing element is half of reading Clarice: the grammar is intact in your head even when it is absent on the page.

Focus and emphasis: cleft and fronting

Clarice constantly fronts material for emphasis, pulling the focused element to the front of the clause. In Ser é isto, the bare infinitive ser ("to be") is hauled to subject position — the verb itself becomes the topic. And in não saber se sou eu que a vejo ou ela que me inventa, she uses two cleft constructions (sou eu que..., ela que...) to spotlight the contrast between subject and object, seer and seen.

Sou eu que a vejo.

It is I who see it. (cleft — emphasis on the subject 'eu')

Ou ela que me inventa.

Or it that invents me. (parallel cleft, reversing subject and object)

The cleft é... que (it is... that) is Portuguese's standard focusing tool, exactly parallel to English "it is X that." Clarice uses it not for ordinary emphasis but to stage a philosophical reversal: does the self perceive the apple, or does the apple constitute the self? The grammar of focus carries the idea.

💡

When you see sou eu que..., é ela que..., foi você que..., read it as English "it is I/she/you who/that..." The cleft splits one plain sentence (eu a vejo) into a focused frame (sou eu que a vejo), throwing a spotlight on the fronted element.

The present tense of introspection

Notice how the passage lives almost entirely in the present indicative: existo, está, tem, sinto, não cabe, há, sou, vejo, inventa, tenho, é. Clarice's introspection happens now, in the eternal present of consciousness. The one shift to the past — Eu queria dizer ("I wanted to say") — and to the existential past — não havia nada ("there was nothing") — stand out precisely because everything around them is present.

É de manhã e eu existo.

It is morning and I exist. (present indicative — the immediacy of being)

Eu queria dizer o que sinto.

I wanted to say what I feel. (imperfect 'queria' for a softened, lingering wish; present 'sinto' for the ongoing feeling)

The present indicative in Portuguese, as in English, marks general truths and ongoing states. Clarice exploits this: by keeping nearly every verb in the present, she dissolves narrative time and leaves only the bare fact of existing. The imperfect queria (rather than preterite quis) is also telling — it is the tense of an unfinished, hovering desire, not a completed act of wanting.

Abstract nouns and unusual collocations

The vocabulary is studded with abstract nouns used as if they were concrete objects: o ser (being), a coisa (the thing), o instante (the instant), o silêncio (the silence), o tamanho do silêncio (the size of the silence). That last phrase is an unusual collocation — silence has no size — and the strangeness is intentional: it forces the reader to feel an abstraction physically.

Tenho medo do tamanho do silêncio.

I am afraid of the size of the silence. (silence given a 'size' — a deliberately strange collocation)

O nome não a alcança.

The name does not reach it. (a name made into something that can 'reach' or fail to reach)

Verbs of physical action (alcançar, to reach; caber, to fit) are applied to words and feelings: o nome não a alcança (the name doesn't reach it), o que sinto não cabe na palavra sentir (what I feel doesn't fit in the word "to feel"). This personification of language itself is a Clarice signature — the very inadequacy of words becomes her subject.

Paradox and repetition

Two more devices define the style. Repetition: Apenas o instante echoes O instante; Tenho medo. Tenho medo do tamanho do silêncio repeats the opening to deepen it. And paradox: não saber se sou eu que a vejo ou ela que me inventa dissolves the boundary between perceiver and perceived; É de manhã e eu existo. Isso já é quase demais treats mere existence as an overwhelming excess.

Eu existo. Isso já é quase demais.

I exist. That is already almost too much. (paradox — existence framed as excess)

These are not grammatical errors but rhetorical choices, and they are what make her prose famous and difficult.

Literary and register note

Clarice Lispector's style is sometimes called escrita do instante (writing of the instant) — an attempt to capture consciousness as it happens, before grammar tidies it into narrative. The register is high literary, but unlike Machado's, it is not archaic: there is no mesoclisis, no synthetic pluperfect, no 19th-century enclisis. Her difficulty is the opposite kind — modern vocabulary and modern verb forms arranged in deliberately broken, fragmentary, paradoxical syntax. For the C1 reader, the lesson is that "advanced" Portuguese is not only the formal-archaic register of legal or Machadian prose; it is also the modernist register that bends syntax for effect. Learning to read both is what fluency in the written language means.

Common Mistakes

❌ Treating 'O instante. Apenas o instante.' as broken or wrong Portuguese.

Trap — these are deliberate stylistic fragments, not errors.

✅ Read verbless fragments as isolated, emphasized concepts.

The missing verb is the point; the noun stands alone for effect.

❌ Reading 'Sou eu que a vejo' as just 'I see it.'

Trap — the cleft adds emphasis: 'It is I who see it.'

✅ 'Sou eu que a vejo' = 'It is I (and not the apple) who does the seeing.'

The cleft foregrounds the subject for contrast.

❌ Citing this passage as a real Clarice Lispector quotation.

Trap — it is an original pastiche written for this lesson, not her words.

✅ Use it to study her style; never attribute it to her.

A stylistic pastiche, clearly labeled as such.

❌ Reading 'e eu, pequena' as a noun phrase with no verb intended.

Trap — the verb 'sou' is gapped, understood from the prior clause.

✅ 'e eu, pequena' = 'and I [am] small.'

Verb omission (gapping) recovers 'sou' from context.

❌ Forcing 'o tamanho do silêncio' into a literal reading.

Trap — the strange collocation is intentional; silence is given a 'size' for effect.

✅ Read unusual collocations as deliberate, meaning-making strangeness.

The oddness forces an abstraction to feel concrete.

Key takeaways

Clarice's difficulty is modern: ordinary words, deliberately broken syntax — the opposite of Machado's archaism.
Fragments (O instante.) and gapping (e eu, pequena) drop verbs on purpose; recover them mentally.
Cleft constructions (sou eu que...) front and emphasize; read them as "it is X that/who...".
The present indicative dominates, dissolving narrative time into the eternal now of consciousness.
The passage here is an original pastiche, not a genuine quotation — study the style, do not cite it.

Now practice Portuguese

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Portuguese→