The Three-Way 이 / 그 / 저 (why Korean 'this/that' beats English)

English divides the world into two: this (near) and that (everything else). Korean divides it into three, and the third distinction is genuinely useful — it tracks not just distance but whose side something is on. 이 is near the speaker, 그 is near the listener or refers to something already known, and 저 is far from both. Once you feel this three-way split, you'll find English's two-way system slightly blunt: it can't tell "that thing by you" from "that thing way over there", but Korean can. The one thing English speakers must retrain is the reflex to map every "that" onto 저 — most of the time, the right word is 그.

The three-way system

All three demonstratives are prenominal modifiers: they sit directly in front of a noun (이/그/저 + noun) and never inflect — no endings, no agreement. What changes is where the thing sits relative to the two people talking.

WordAnchorMeaning
이near the speaker (proximal)this — here by me
그near the listener, or already mentioned / mutually known (medial)that — by you, or the one we spoke of
저far from both (distal)that — over there, away from us both

이 — near the speaker

Use 이 for something in your own sphere: in your hand, right beside you, the thing you're holding out.

이 책 정말 재미있어요.

i chaek jeongmal jaemiisseoyo.

This book is really interesting. (the book here by me)

이 커피 제 거예요.

i keopi je geoyeyo.

This coffee is mine. (near me)

그 — near the listener, or already known

그 is the addressee-anchored one, and it does double duty. Physically, it means "that … by you" — near the listener rather than the speaker. Discursively, it means "that … we already mentioned / that you and I both know about". This second use is enormous: whenever you point back to something in the conversation, you use 그.

그 책 좀 건네줄래요?

geu chaek jom geonnejullaeyo?

Could you pass me that book? (the one there by you)

그 영화 저도 봤어요.

geu yeonghwa jeodo bwasseoyo.

I saw that movie too. (the movie we just mentioned)

아까 그 사람 누구예요?

akka geu saram nuguyeyo?

Who was that person from earlier? (someone we both have in mind)

The last two point at nothing physical at all — they reach back into shared knowledge. That "referring-back" 그 is covered in depth on its own referential 그 page, and it's the single most common demonstrative in real speech.

저 — far from both of you

저 is the true "over yonder": far from the speaker and the listener, something you can both see in the distance.

저 건물이 시청이에요.

jeo geonmuri sicheong-ieyo.

That building over there is city hall. (far from us both)

저기 저 사람 알아요?

jeogi jeo saram arayo?

Do you know that person over there? (distant from both of us)

The insight English speakers most need: 그 ≠ 저

Because English collapses 그 and 저 into a single "that", English speakers default to 저 for every "that" — and get it wrong most of the time. The rule to internalize:

When "that" points back to something already said, or something you both know, it's 그 — not 저. Reserve 저 for things physically far from both of you.

그 가방 말고 저 가방이요.

geu gabang malgo jeo gabang-iyo.

Not that bag (by you) — that one over there. (그 vs 저 contrasted)

That single sentence uses both: 그 가방 is the bag near the listener, 저 가방 is the bag in the distance. English would need "that bag" and "that one over there" — three extra words to do what Korean does with two syllables.

💡
Default to 그, not 저, for "that". Most English "that" — especially any "that" pointing back to something mentioned or mutually known — is 그. Use 저 only when the thing is physically far from both speaker and listener. Getting this backwards (저 얘기 for "that story we discussed") is the classic beginner error.

Watch out: 저 is also "I" (humble)

A quick but important ambiguity: the distal demonstrative 저 is spelled identically to the humble first-person pronoun 저 ("I"), covered on the 나 vs 저 page. Context disambiguates instantly — 저 사람 is "that person over there", 저는 is "I" (the topic particle 는 gives it away) — but beginners sometimes read one as the other. When 저 sits directly before a noun, it's the demonstrative; when it takes a subject/topic particle (저는, 제가), it's "I".

One stem, a whole family

The three demonstratives aren't isolated words — they're stems that generate parallel families. Learn 이/그/저 once and you get three matched sets for free:

Stem
  • 것 (thing)
place
  • 런 (such)
이 (this)이것 (this one)여기 (here)이런 (this kind of)
그 (that/known)그것 (that one)거기 (there)그런 (that kind of)
저 (yonder)저것 (that one over there)저기 (over there)저런 (that kind of, distant)

Each family keeps the exact same three-way anchoring, so the distinction you learn here transfers directly. The pronoun forms 이것/그것/저것 get their own 이것 / 거기 page, and the "such a" forms 이런/그런/저런 are on the 이런 / 그런 / 저런 page.

이것보다 그것이 더 좋아요.

igeotboda geugeosi deo joayo.

That one (by you) is better than this one.

여기서 기다릴게요.

yeogiseo gidarilgeyo.

I'll wait here. (여기, from stem 이)

💡
You never have to memorize these families as separate vocabulary. Fix the anchoring of 이/그/저 once — speaker / listener-or-known / far-from-both — and it transfers unchanged to 것 (이것/그것/저것), places (여기/거기/저기), and 런 (이런/그런/저런). One distinction, learned deeply, unlocks the whole grid.

How this differs from English

English has a two-way deictic system (this/that), and "that" is a catch-all for everything not near me — whether it's in your hand, across the room, or a topic from yesterday. Korean's three-way system splits that catch-all into an addressee/known zone (그) and a far zone (저). The upside is precision; the cost is that English speakers must stop treating "that" as a single concept. The mental switch is: is this thing near the person I'm talking to, or something we both already know? → 그. Is it far from both of us? → 저. Make that split automatic and Korean's demonstratives become sharper and clearer than the English ones you grew up with.

Common Mistakes

1. Using 저 for "that … we talked about". Referring back to shared knowledge is 그, never 저.

  • ✗ 어제 저 얘기 기억나요? (저 makes it "that story way over there")
  • ✓ 어제 그 얘기 기억나요? — eoje geu yaegi gieongnayo? — "Do you remember that story from yesterday?"

2. Inflecting the demonstrative. 이/그/저 are invariant modifiers — no particle attaches to them directly; the particle goes on the noun.

  • ✗ 이가 책이에요 / 이는 책 (treating 이 like a noun)
  • ✓ 이 책이에요. — i chaegieyo — "It's this book." (이 modifies, 책 takes the particle)

3. Using 저것/저기 for something in the listener's hand. If it's by the listener, it's 그것/거기, not 저것/저기.

  • ✗ (pointing at the phone in your friend's hand) 저거 좀 줘.
  • ✓ 그거 좀 줘. — geugeo jom jwo — "Pass me that (in your hand)." (near listener → 그)

4. Treating 그 as the English article "the". 그 means "that / the aforementioned" and always points back to something known — it doesn't neutrally make a noun definite.

  • ✗ using 그 in front of every noun to mean "the"
  • ✓ 그 책 = geu chaek = "that book (the one we mentioned)" — it carries a pointing-back sense, not a bare "the".

Key Takeaways

  • Korean demonstratives are a three-way system: 이 (near speaker), 그 (near listener or already mentioned/known), 저 (far from both) — versus English's two-way this/that.
  • All three are invariant prenominal modifiers: 이/그/저 + noun, no inflection; the particle attaches to the noun.
  • The key retraining: most English "that" is 그, not 저 — especially "that" pointing back to something mentioned or mutually known. 저 is only for what's physically far from both people.
  • The distal 저 is spelled like humble "I" (저); before a noun it's the demonstrative, with 는/가 it's the pronoun.
  • The stems generate matched families: 이것/그것/저것, 여기/거기/저기, 이런/그런/저런 — same three-way anchoring throughout.

Now practice Korean

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Korean →

Related Topics

  • 이것/그것/저것 and 여기/거기/저기 (things and places)TOPIK 1 — How the 이/그/저 stems build full pronouns for things (이것/그것/저것), places (여기/거기/저기), and directions (이쪽/그쪽/저쪽) — including the heavy everyday contractions (이게, 그건, 저걸, 거기서) and why 거기, not 저기, is 'there where you are.'
  • 이런/그런/저런: 'this kind of / such'TOPIK 2 — The adjectival demonstratives 이런/그런/저런 ('this kind of / that kind of / such') and their manner-adverb partners 이렇게/그렇게/저렇게 ('like this / like that') — why Korean's word for 'such' is deictic, why 그런 is the default, and how not to confuse the determiner with the adverb.
  • Referential 그: 'the' for Known / Shared InformationTOPIK 2 — Beyond 'that near you,' 그 is Korean's main device for 'the (one we both already know)' — carrying the anaphoric-definite load that English hands to the article 'the.' Why 그 (not 이 or 저) marks something already mentioned, when to add it, and why 그/그녀 are NOT the spoken 'he/she.'
  • 것 / 거: The General Noun 'thing / one'TOPIK 1 — 것 (colloquial 거) is Korean's all-purpose noun 'thing / one' — it turns demonstratives, possessors, adjectives, and whole clauses into full noun phrases, and it contracts hard with particles in speech (게, 건, 걸).