Reported Commands | Farsi Grammar

When Persian reports an earlier command instead of quoting it, the original second-person imperative normally becomes a present subjunctive agreeing with the person expected to act. Direct مینا به من گفت: «اینجا بمان.» becomes indirect مینا به من گفت که آنجا بمانم “Mina told me to stay there.” The command remains future-oriented relative to the original act of speaking, even though گفت is past.

This page focuses on retelling a directive: person and viewpoint shift from the original exchange to the current report. The related Indirect Commands and Requests page compares the lexical frames خواستن از، گفتن به، خواهش کردن، دستور دادن more broadly.

From imperative to subjunctive

An imperative directly addresses تو or شما. Once the command is embedded, its subject can be first, second, or third person, so the full subjunctive paradigm becomes available.

Original directive	Person expected to act in the report	Reported form
«بیا.»	من	به من گفت که بیایم
«بیا.»	علی	به علی گفت که بیاید
«بیایید.»	ما	به ما گفت که بیاییم
«بیایید.»	دانشجوها	به دانشجوها گفت که بیایند
«نرو.»	او	به او گفت که نرود

مینا به من گفت: «اینجا بمان.»

minâ be man goft: «injâ be-mân.»

Mina said to me, ‘Stay here.’ (direct quotation; second-singular imperative)

مینا به من گفت که آنجا بمانم.

minâ be man goft ke ânjâ be-mânam.

Mina told me to stay there. (indirect report; first-singular subjunctive and adjusted place)

پدرم به علی گفت که زودتر به خانه بیاید.

pedar-am be ali goft ke zud-tar be khâne biyâyad.

My father told Ali to come home earlier. (neutral standard; Ali controls third-singular بیاید)

استاد به ما گفت که مقاله را تا جمعه تحویل بدهیم.

ostâd be mâ goft ke maqâle râ tâ jom'e tahvil be-dahim.

The professor told us to submit the paper by Friday. (neutral standard; first-plural subjunctive)

The imperative has not been “put into the past.” It has been replaced by a dependent mood that can identify the new grammatical person. Persian's subjunctive is therefore closer to English to come in function, but unlike an English infinitive it carries agreement.

💡

Do not preserve the original تو/شما ending mechanically. Ask who must carry out the order in the current report, then choose بیایم، بیایی، بیاید، بیاییم، بیایید، بیایند accordingly.

Positive and negative commands

Positive reported commands use the present subjunctive. With many simple verbs this has بـ + present stem + ending; compound verbs place mood on the light verb. A negative imperative already begins with نـ, and the reported negative subjunctive keeps نـ while adding the appropriate person ending.

سرپرست به کارآموز گفت که همه‌ی عددها را دوباره بررسی کند.

sarparast be kâr-âmuz goft ke hame-ye adad-hâ râ do-bâre barrasi konad.

The supervisor told the trainee to check all the figures again. (formal-neutral; compound verb)

مادر به بچه‌ها گفت که به اجاق دست نزنند.

mâdar be bachche-hâ goft ke be ojâq dast na-zanand.

The mother told the children not to touch the stove. (neutral standard; negative plural subjunctive)

پزشک به من گفت که تا فردا غذای سنگین نخورم.

pezeshk be man goft ke tâ fardâ ghazâ-ye sangin na-khoram.

The doctor told me not to eat heavy food until tomorrow. (neutral standard; first-singular negative subjunctive)

مسئول ایمنی دستور داد که هیچ‌کس وارد محوطه نشود.

mas'ul-e imeni dastur dâd ke hich-kas vâred-e mohavvate na-shavad.

The safety officer ordered that nobody enter the area. (formal/authoritative; overt embedded subject)

The last example names no recipient with به, but هیچ‌کس overtly identifies the commanded group inside the complement. This is useful in official reporting, where the order matters more than the original addressee.

Complementizer and recipient choices

Careful written Persian commonly uses به + recipient + گفت که + subjunctive. که can be omitted in speech: به من گفت زودتر بیایم. The recipient may also be absent if context already identifies the actor: گفت زودتر بیایم normally means that the speaker was told to come early when بیایم is first person.

رئیس به من گفت که پیش از جلسه گزارش را بخوانم.

ra'is be man goft ke pish az jalase gozâresh râ be-khânam.

The boss told me to read the report before the meeting. (careful neutral standard)

رئیس گفت پیش از جلسه گزارش را بخوانم.

ra'is goft pish az jalase gozâresh râ be-khânam.

The boss said I should read the report before the meeting. (neutral spoken standard; recipient and که recovered from context)

Without an overt recipient, a third-person subjunctive can be referentially ambiguous: گفت زودتر بیاید may mean that the reporting subject should come, or that some other contextually salient person should. Add به علی or an overt embedded subject when the distinction matters.

Tense retention and deictic adjustment

Commands are oriented toward an action later than the original command, so the embedded subjunctive remains subjunctive regardless of whether the reporting verb is present, past, or perfect. What may change are pronouns, possessors, place words, time words, and motion perspective.

لیلا دیروز به من گفت که امروز پرونده را برایش ببرم.

leylâ diruz be man goft ke emruz parvande râ barâ-yash be-baram.

Leila told me yesterday to take the file to her today. (neutral standard; first-person actor and adjusted motion perspective)

مدیر هفته‌ی پیش گفت که همه روز بعد در دفتر حاضر باشند.

modir hafte-ye pish goft ke hame ruz-e ba'd dar daftar hâzer bâshand.

Last week the manager said that everyone should be present in the office the following day. (formal-neutral; time expression adjusted)

نگهبان یادآوری کرده است که بازدیدکنندگان از این در وارد شوند.

negahbân yâd-âvari karde ast ke bâzdid-konandegân az in dar vâred shavand.

The guard has reminded visitors to enter through this door. (formal-neutral; current location retains این)

اینجا does not always become آنجا, nor does امروز always become آن روز. Change a deictic expression only when the current reporter occupies a different place or date from the original speaker. This is the same reference-based principle used in reported statements.

💡

The tense of گفت/گفته است does not “backshift” a command. Mood changes from direct imperative to dependent subjunctive; person and deixis change only because the reporting viewpoint changes.

Formal obligations as alternatives

Official prose often reports the force of an instruction rather than reconstructing its exact words. دستور دادن که + subjunctive presents an order; تأکید کردن که باید + subjunctive presents a reinforced obligation; درخواست کردن که + subjunctive presents a formal request.

مدیریت دستور داد که درهای اضطراری باز بمانند.

modiriyyat dastur dâd ke dar-hâ-ye ezterâri bâz be-mânand.

Management ordered that the emergency doors remain open. (formal/administrative)

سخنگو تأکید کرد که کارکنان باید مقررات را رعایت کنند.

sokhangu ta'kid kard ke kârkonân bâyad moqarrarât râ re'âyat konand.

The spokesperson stressed that employees had to follow the regulations. (formal; reported obligation rather than wording)

The second structure contains باید, so it reports the obligation's content without claiming that the source uttered an imperative. This is a semantic alternative, not merely a more formal spelling of the same quotation.

Quote-like commands in conversation

Colloquial Tehran Persian frequently reenacts the original command after گفتن به: به من گفت برو بیرون. The imperative keeps the original second-person perspective and behaves like a compact quotation, even when quotation marks are absent in transcription.

بهم گفت برو بیرون و ده دقیقه صبر کن.

be-ham goft boro birun-o dah daqiqe sabr kon.

He or she told me, ‘Go outside and wait ten minutes.’ (informal, regional: Tehran; quote-like imperatives)

بهم گفت که برم بیرون و ده دقیقه صبر کنم.

be-ham goft ke beram birun-o dah daqiqe sabr konam.

He or she told me to go outside and wait ten minutes. (informal, regional: Tehran; fully shifted subjunctives)

The first reproduces the command's voice; the second reports it from the current speaker's perspective. Formal prose uses standard به من، بروم، کنم and normally makes direct quotation visible with a colon and Persian quotation marks.

Common Mistakes

1. Keeping an imperative with an overt third-person subject

❌ مینا گفت که علی زودتر بیا.

Incorrect — overt third-person علی requires reported subjunctive بیاید, not second-person imperative بیا.

✅ مینا گفت که علی زودتر به ایستگاه بیاید.

minâ goft ke ali zud-tar be istgâh biyâyad.

Mina said that Ali should come to the station earlier.

2. Using a long infinitive after که

❌ رئیس گفت که گزارش را فرستادن.

Incorrect — a reported command needs a finite subjunctive identifying the actor.

✅ رئیس گفت که گزارش را تا ظهر بفرستیم.

ra'is goft ke gozâresh râ tâ zohr be-ferestim.

The boss said we should send the report by noon.

3. Combining indicative می‌ with subjunctive بـ

❌ استاد گفت که متن را بمی‌نویسیم.

Incorrect — reported directive mood uses بنویسیم, not stacked بـ + می‌.

✅ استاد گفت که متن را با واژه‌های خودمان بنویسیم.

ostâd goft ke matn râ bâ vâzhe-hâ-ye khod-emân be-nevisim.

The professor said we should write the text in our own words.

4. Keeping both negative نـ and affirmative بـ

❌ پزشک گفت که نببخورم.

Incorrect — negative نـ replaces affirmative subjunctive بـ.

✅ پزشک گفت که تا صبح چیزی نخورم.

pezeshk goft ke tâ sobh chizi na-khoram.

The doctor said I should not eat anything until morning.

Key Takeaways

A direct second-person imperative normally becomes a person-marked present subjunctive in an indirect report.
The intended actor controls the subjunctive ending; state the recipient or embedded subject when reference is unclear.
Negative reported commands use نـ + present stem + ending, without affirmative بـ.
Person, place, time, possessors, and motion words change only when the reporting viewpoint changes.
A colloquial imperative after گفتن به is quote-like; a fully indirect report shifts it to the subjunctive.

Now practice Farsi

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Farsi →