Public-Domain Khayyam: A Simple Rubai

This spring rubai urges enjoyment of the present. It appears in collections attributed to the eleventh–twelfth-century poet Omar Khayyam, including Ramazani’s public-domain edition. Its literary compression combines recognizable چهره‌ی گل, روی دل‌افروز, generic گویی, and the imperatives خوش باش and مگو.

The Ramazani edition’s rubai 46 on Wikisource and Hedayat’s public-domain selection place it under Khayyam. Ganjoor’s rubai 19 links a related text under Attar, with first-couplet variants. We therefore say traditionally attributed to Khayyam, not proven. Older چهرهٔ، گوئی، خوشست، دل افروز are normalized to چهره‌ی، گویی، خوش است، دل‌افروز. Review Metaphorical and Poetic Ezafe for the central images.

The Complete Public-Domain Rubai

بر چهره‌ی گل نسیم نوروز خوش است

در صحن چمن روی دل‌افروز خوش است

از دی که گذشت هر چه گویی خوش نیست

خوش باش و ز دی مگو که امروز خوش است

An original, meter-aware translation is: “The Nowruz breeze upon the flower’s face is sweet; / within the garden, a heart-kindling face is sweet. / Whatever you say of yesterday brings no delight: / be glad, and speak no more of then—for today is sweet.” It preserves four lines and the repeated judgment without claiming Persian meter.

💡
A close translation and a poetic translation answer different questions. The close gloss reveals grammar; the shaped English version preserves repetition, contrast, and the final imperative. Neither should quietly add ideas absent from the Persian.

Line 1: Metaphorical چهره‌ی گل

بر چهره‌ی گل نسیم نوروز خوش است.

bar chehre-ye gol nasim-e Nowruz khosh ast.

The Nowruz breeze upon the flower’s face is delightful. (traditionally attributed to Khayyam; literary, public domain)

The opening location بر چهره‌ی گل precedes the subject نسیم نوروز and final predicate خوش است. This is marked poetic ordering: neutral prose would more readily begin with the breeze. بر is literary-formal “on/upon,” where conversation normally uses روی.

Two ezafe chains make the image. چهره‌ی گل personifies the flower by giving it a face; نسیمِ نوروز identifies the breeze with the season. The ezafe after silent ه is written ه‌ی, while the ezafe after consonant-final نسیم is pronounced but unwritten.

نسیم نوروز روی گل‌های باغ می‌وزد.

nasim-e Nowruz ru-ye gol-hâ-ye bâgh mi-vazad.

The Nowruz breeze blows over the garden flowers. (original modern prose paraphrase)

The paraphrase restores subject-first order and replaces the evaluation خوش است with an event می‌وزد. It explains the scene but loses the poem’s personification.

نور صبح روی چهره‌ی شهر افتاده بود.

nur-e sobh ru-ye chehre-ye shahr oftâde bud.

The morning light had fallen on the city’s face. (original modern metaphorical ezafe)

The original sentence shows that body-part nouns can still personify nonhuman entities in modern literary-neutral writing.

Line 2: روی دل‌افروز

در صحن چمن روی دل‌افروز خوش است.

dar sahn-e chaman ru-ye del-afruz khosh ast.

In the garden court, a heart-kindling face is delightful. (literary)

Here روی is the noun “face,” pronounced ru, not the preposition “on.” Ezafe links it to adjective دل‌افروز, literally “heart-kindling,” an elevated description of a beautiful beloved. English needs an article and may choose “a radiant face”; Persian has no equivalent of a in the line.

صحن چمن is another compact literary phrase: the open court or expanse of the garden. In present-day conversation, در باغ would be simpler and more natural.

در باغ، دیدن چهره‌ی شاد دوستان لذت‌بخش است.

dar bâgh, didan-e chehre-ye shâd-e dustân lezzat-bakhsh ast.

In the garden, seeing friends’ happy faces is delightful. (original formal-neutral paraphrase)

This version states the activity دیدن that the verse leaves implicit. The poetry instead places image and evaluation side by side.

Line 3: هر چه گویی and the Double Meaning of دی

از دی که گذشت هر چه گویی خوش نیست.

az di ke gozasht har che guyi khosh nist.

Whatever you say of yesterday, which has passed, is not delightful. (literary; primary reading of دی as ‘yesterday’)

هر چه گویی is a free-relative frame: “whatever you may say.” Here literary گویی has a non-indicative value without modern subjunctive بـ. Modern conversation normally says هر چی بگی (informal, regional: Tehran) or careful هر چه بگویی.

The spelling دی permits two readings: di “yesterday/the past” and dey, the winter month Dey. The contrast with امروز makes di the primary reading here; Nowruz in line 1 also makes the differently pronounced month name available as a visual and seasonal echo. A responsible reading distinguishes the pronunciations instead of collapsing them into one form.

هر چه درباره‌ی گذشته بگویی، امروز را عوض نمی‌کند.

har che darbâre-ye gozashte beguyi, emruz râ avaz nemi-konad.

Whatever you say about the past does not change today. (original modern paraphrase)

هر چی بگی، من امروز رو خراب نمی‌کنم.

har chi begi, man emruz ro kharâb nemi-konam.

Whatever you say, I’m not going to ruin today. (original informal, regional: Tehran)

The colloquial version preserves the free-relative logic but changes چه to چی, را to رو, and the discourse tone completely.

Line 4: Two Imperatives

خوش باش و ز دی مگو که امروز خوش است.

khosh bâsh va ze di ma-gu ke emruz khosh ast.

Be glad, and do not speak of yesterday, for today is delightful. (literary direct advice)

باش is the affirmative imperative of بودن; it does not take productive بـ in this form. مگو is the classical/literary negative imperative with مـ. Modern standard and conversational Persian use نگو. Literary ز again represents از.

خوش باش و از فرصت امروز استفاده کن.

khosh bâsh va az forsat-e emruz estefâde kon.

Be happy and make use of today’s opportunity. (original modern-neutral advice)

از دیروز نگو؛ بیا درباره‌ی برنامه‌ی امروز حرف بزنیم.

az diruz na-gu; biyâ darbâre-ye barnâme-ye emruz harf bezanim.

Do not talk about yesterday; come on, let’s talk about today’s plan. (original modern conversation)

The modern sentences make the implied practical action explicit.

Word Order, Repetition, and Meter

The first two lines begin with settings, then reveal an image, and only at the end deliver خوش است. The third reverses the evaluation to خوش نیست; the fourth restores خوش است after two commands. That pattern creates expectation even for a learner who cannot scan the meter.

Ganjoor identifies the meter as مفعول مفاعیل مفاعیل فعل, a standard rubai rhythm. At A2, the practical lesson is not to force every word into conversational pronunciation or rearrange it while reciting. Ezafe vowels and short literary forms such as ز help the line fit its rhythm.

امروز کوتاه است؛ از شادی ساده‌اش لذت ببر.

emruz kutâh ast; az shâdi-ye sâde-ash lezzat bebar.

Today is brief; enjoy its simple happiness. (original prose inspired by the theme, not part of the rubai)

در ترجمه‌ی شعر، تکرار «خوش است» را حفظ کردم.

dar tarjome-ye she'r, tekrâr-e «khosh ast» râ hefz kardam.

In translating the poem, I preserved the repetition of ‘is delightful.’ (original translator’s comment)

💡
A meter-aware translation does not insert extra wine, fate, or philosophy merely because readers expect “Khayyam.” This rubai’s actual movement is spring image → rejection of the past → command to inhabit today.

Register and Responsible Attribution

بر، صحن چمن، ز، دی, مگو and the compact noun phrases mark literary diction. امروز، گل، نسیم، خوش، باش remain ordinary words. A modern speaker may quote the fourth line exactly, but outside quotation would normally say از دیروز نگو.

این رباعی به خیام منسوب است، اما انتساب همه‌ی رباعیات قطعی نیست.

in robâ'i be Khayyâm mansub ast, ammâ entesâb-e hame-ye robâ'iyât qat'i nist.

This rubai is attributed to Khayyam, but the attribution of every rubai is not certain. (original scholarly caution)

This wording separates textual presence in a Khayyam collection from certainty about medieval authorship.

Common Mistakes

1. Reading روی as the preposition “on”

⚠️ روی دل‌افروز یعنی روی چیزی که دل‌افروز است.

ru-ye del-afruz ya'ni ru-ye chizi ke del-afruz ast.

روی دل‌افروز means ‘on something heart-kindling.’ The sentence is grammatical, but the interpretation is wrong here: روی is the noun ‘face,’ modified by دل‌افروز through ezafe.

✅ روی دل‌افروز یعنی چهره‌ی دل‌افروز.

ru-ye del-afruz ya'ni chehre-ye del-afruz.

روی دل‌افروز means a heart-kindling face.

2. Treating مگو as an everyday neutral form

⚠️ لطفا در جلسه از این موضوع مگو.

lotfâ dar jalase az in mowzu' ma-gu.

Please do not speak of this matter in the meeting. Grammatical literary Persian, but conspicuously elevated for ordinary workplace speech.

✅ لطفا در جلسه درباره‌ی این موضوع چیزی نگو.

lotfâ dar jalase darbâre-ye in mowzu' chizi na-gu.

Please do not say anything about this issue in the meeting. (modern neutral)

3. Flattening دی into only one meaning

⚠️ دی در هر دو خط فقط نام ماه دهم است.

dey dar har do khatt faqat nâm-e mâh-e dahom ast.

Dey in both lines is only the name of the tenth month. Grammatically possible as a statement, but too categorical for the poem’s contrast with امروز and its seasonal imagery.

✅ واژه‌ی دی در معنای «دیروز» گذشته را تداعی می‌کند و نام ماه دی با نوروز تقابل فصلی دارد.

vâzhe-ye di dar ma'nâ-ye «diruz» gozashte râ tadâ'i mi-konad va nâm-e mâh-e dey bâ Nowruz taqâbol-e fasli dârad.

The word دی meaning ‘yesterday’ evokes the past, while the month name Dey forms a seasonal contrast with Nowruz.

4. Claiming certain authorship

⚠️ بدون هیچ تردیدی، خیام این رباعی را سروده است.

bedun-e hich tardidi, Khayyâm in robâ'i râ sorude ast.

Without any doubt, Khayyam composed this rubai. Grammatical, but stronger than the textual evidence allows.

✅ این رباعی در چند مجموعه به خیام نسبت داده شده است.

in robâ'i dar chand majmu'e be Khayyâm nesbat dâde shode ast.

This rubai has been attributed to Khayyam in several collections. (responsible attribution)

Key Takeaways

  • Metaphorical ezafe creates چهره‌ی گل and رویِ دل‌افروز.
  • Poetic setting-first order delays repeated خوش است until each line’s end.
  • هر چه گویی means “whatever you may say”; modern speech prefers هر چی بگی.
  • Written دی permits literary di “yesterday” and the month name dey; the contrast with امروز favors the first while the Nowruz setting echoes the second.
  • مگو is a literary negative imperative; modern neutral Persian uses نگو.
  • Cite the poem as traditionally attributed to Khayyam and state the source edition rather than claiming certain authorship.

Now practice Farsi

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Farsi

Related Topics

  • Metaphorical and Poetic EzâfeC1Interpret and create ezâfe phrases that compress metaphor, comparison, personification, and classical poetic imagery.
  • Poetic Word Order and HyperbatonC1Recover Persian clause structure when poetry separates dependents, delays verbs, reverses familiar phrases, or leaves repeated material unspoken.
  • Affirmative Imperative with بA2Build familiar singular commands from the Persian present stem, including simple, prefixed, and compound verbs.
  • Negative Imperative with نA2Form Persian prohibitions with نـ, place negation correctly in simple and compound verbs, and control their social force.
  • Poetic Meter and PronunciationB2Read classical Persian quantitative meter by syllable weight, including ezâfe, overlong syllables, and licensed poetic contractions.