English sorry covers several different acts: asking forgiveness, expressing regret, showing sympathy, interrupting, and correcting a slip. Esperanto normally chooses among pardonu, mi bedaŭras, mi petas pardonon, and repair markers such as mi volis diri. The choice tells the listener what kind of problem you are addressing.
A successful apology also has variable slots. Name the offense with pro + noun or ke + clause, acknowledge the consequence, and say what you will do next. A conversational repair instead identifies the faulty wording and replaces it. These related acts should not be collapsed into one translated formula.
Pardonu: ask the listener to pardon
Pardonu! is a volitive verb form: literally, “pardon [me/this].” It is the neutral, flexible expression for a minor offense, an interruption, getting someone's attention, or asking for repetition.
Pardonu, ĉu ĉi tiu seĝo estas libera?
Excuse me, is this seat free?
Pardonu, mi ne bone aŭdis. Ĉu vi povus ripeti la lastan nomon?
Sorry, I didn't hear well. Could you repeat the last name?
The person receiving pardon can appear as min or al mi. The Fundamenta model Pardonu al mi … is still correct, and PMEG also recognizes Pardonu min. Contemporary conversation strongly favors the compact standalone Pardonu when the participants are obvious.
Pardonu min pro la interrompo; bonvolu daŭrigi.
Forgive me for the interruption; please continue.
State a nominal reason with pro and an event with ke:
Pardonu, ke mi respondis tiel malfrue.
Sorry that I replied so late.
The clause after ke is something presented as real, so it normally uses the indicative: ke mi respondis, not a volitive form. You are asking for pardon, but the late reply itself is not a command or wish.
Pardonon! is also an established exclamation. It is concise and useful for a small collision or interruption. Pardonu integrates more easily with ke-clauses and requests, so it is the better all-purpose frame for learners.
Mi bedaŭras: express regret or sympathy
Bedaŭri means regret, be sorry about, or deplore. It reports the speaker's feeling; it does not by itself ask the listener to forgive anything. This makes it suitable both for your own mistake and for bad news that you did not cause.
Mi bedaŭras, ke mi forgesis nian rendevuon.
I'm sorry that I forgot our appointment.
Mi tre bedaŭras aŭdi pri la malsano de via patro.
I am very sorry to hear about your father's illness.
That is the key minimal contrast. Pardonu, ke mi malfruis addresses the person affected and seeks pardon. Mi bedaŭras, ke la trajno ne venis expresses regret about an event that may not be your fault.
Mi bedaŭras, sed ni ne povos liveri la mendon ĝis vendredo.
I'm sorry, but we will not be able to deliver the order until Friday.
In service communication, Mi bedaŭras, sed … is (neutral to formal). It softens unwelcome information, but an apology sounds empty if the organization is responsible and offers no remedy.
Stronger and more explicit apologies
Mi petas pardonon pro … explicitly says “I ask forgiveness for …” and is stronger than a passing pardonu. It suits a serious mistake or deliberate written apology. Mi pardonpetas pro … packages the same idea into one transparent verb and is also current.
Mi petas pardonon pro mia akra tono dum la kunveno.
I apologize for my harsh tone during the meeting.
Ni sincere pardonpetas pro la erara fakturo kaj jam sendis korektitan version.
We sincerely apologize for the incorrect invoice and have already sent a corrected version.
A complete apology often follows this sequence:
- identify the wrong action;
- recognize its effect;
- offer a concrete repair.
Mi bedaŭras, ke mi sendis vian mesaĝon al la malĝusta grupo. Tio malkaŝis privatan informon, kaj mi jam petis la administranton forigi ĝin.
I am sorry that I sent your message to the wrong group. That exposed private information, and I have already asked the administrator to remove it.
This sounds more responsible than intensifying tre bedaŭras several times. The language of repair matters as much as the apology marker.
Repairing what you said
Conversation repair is not always an apology. If you choose the wrong word, use Mi volis diri … “I meant to say …,” Pli ĝuste, … “more precisely,” or Alivorte, … “in other words.”
La renkontiĝo estos ĵaŭde — pardonu, mi volis diri vendrede.
The meeting will be on Thursday—sorry, I meant Friday.
Ni bezonas nuligi la planon; pli ĝuste, ni devas prokrasti ĝin ĝis Majo.
We need to cancel the plan; more precisely, we must postpone it until May.
Mi volis diri marks replacement of an unintended expression. Mi volas diri can introduce a current explanation—“what I mean is”—but does not itself signal that the previous word was a slip.
When the listener detects trouble, use a clarification question rather than pretending to understand:
Ĉu vi volas diri, ke la prezo jam inkluzivas liveron? — Jes, ĝuste tion mi celas.
Do you mean that the price already includes delivery? — Yes, that is exactly what I mean.
Mi ne certas, ĉu mi komprenis vin. Ĉu temas pri ĉi tiu semajno aŭ la venonta?
I'm not sure whether I understood you. Is this about this week or next week?
Useful self-repair frames include Mi esprimis min malklare “I expressed myself unclearly” and Ni miskomprenis unu la alian “we misunderstood each other.” The first accepts responsibility; the second presents the problem as mutual and should not be used to evade clear responsibility.
Regret, responsibility, and unfortunate facts
The sentence adverb bedaŭrinde means “unfortunately.” It evaluates a situation but does not say who regrets it or accept responsibility. Compare Bedaŭrinde, la koncerto estas nuligita with Ni bedaŭras, ke ni devis nuligi la koncerton. The second names the responsible speaker group and is therefore more personal.
Bedaŭrinde, la lifto ne funkcias hodiaŭ.
Unfortunately, the elevator is not working today.
Ni bedaŭras la ĝenon kaj venigis teknikiston por ripari la lifton.
We regret the inconvenience and have brought in a technician to repair the elevator.
When responsibility matters, say it plainly: Estas mia kulpo, Mi respondecas pri tio, or Mi ne sufiĉe kontrolis …. These are not obligatory ritual formulas, but they prevent an apology from hiding the agent behind an “unfortunate” event.
Estas mia kulpo: mi ne kontrolis la adreson antaŭ ol sendi la pakaĵon.
It is my fault: I did not check the address before sending the package.
In a disputed situation, do not apologize for an action you do not acknowledge. You can still recognize impact: Mi bedaŭras, ke la mesaĝo vin vundis; mi volas kompreni kial. The more detailed pragmatics of apologizing and repairing treats responsibility, sincerity, and face-saving beyond these core expression frames.
Avoid the conditional non-apology “I am sorry if you were offended” when the harmful effect is already known. Esperanto makes the same evasion visible: Mi bedaŭras, se vi ofendiĝis presents the offense as uncertain. If it is established, say Mi bedaŭras, ke mi ofendis vin and address the action directly. Use se only when the condition is genuinely unknown.
Responding to an apology
For a minor problem, Ne gravas “it doesn't matter,” Nenio grava “nothing serious,” or En ordo “all right” can close the exchange. Mi komprenas acknowledges the explanation without necessarily declaring the harm irrelevant.
Pardonu pro la prokrasto. — Ne gravas; la kunveno ankoraŭ ne komenciĝis.
Sorry for the delay. — No problem; the meeting hasn't started yet.
For a serious problem, an immediate Ne gravas may sound dismissive or falsely forgiving. A measured response such as Dankon, ke vi diris tion. Mi bezonas iom da tempo is honest and polite.
Mi vere bedaŭras mian konduton hieraŭ. — Dankon pro la pardonpeto. Mi volas pripensi tion antaŭ ol respondi.
I truly regret my behavior yesterday. — Thank you for the apology. I want to think about it before responding.
The core forms are foundational or transparently derived; their social force comes from contemporary usage and context. Older literary examples may use the longer pardonu al mi. That is accepted variation, not a required mark of formality. For modern international conversation, pardonu, pardonu min, and mi bedaŭras, ke … are clear defaults.
Common Mistakes
1. Copying English “I am sorry” with an adjective.
❌ Mi estas bedaŭra, ke mi malfruis.
Incorrect: Esperanto normally uses the verb bedaŭri for personal regret.
✅ Mi bedaŭras, ke mi malfruis.
I'm sorry that I was late.
2. Using de for the reason.
❌ Pardonu min de la interrompo.
Incorrect: de does not mark the offense being apologized for.
✅ Pardonu min pro la interrompo.
Forgive me for the interruption.
3. Saying that you forgive yourself instead of asking forgiveness.
❌ Mi pardonas min pro la eraro.
This says ‘I forgive myself for the error,’ not ‘I apologize.’
✅ Mi petas pardonon pro la eraro.
I apologize for the error.
4. Keeping a finite ending after an infinitive-taking verb.
❌ La trajno foriros je la sesa — pardonu, mi volis diris je la sepa.
Incorrect: after volis, the second verb must be an infinitive.
✅ La trajno foriros je la sesa — pardonu, mi volis diri je la sepa.
The train will leave at six—sorry, I meant at seven.
Key Takeaways
- Pardonu asks pardon or politely interrupts; mi bedaŭras expresses regret or sympathy.
- Give a reason with pro + noun or ke + indicative clause.
- Serious apologies should identify the harm and offer a repair, not merely intensify the formula.
- Correct a slip with mi volis diri or pli ĝuste and ask explicit clarification when understanding is uncertain.
Now practice Esperanto
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Esperanto →Related Topics
- Conversation Management PhrasesB2 — Open, hold, repair, redirect, and close an Esperanto conversation with pragmatic frames suited to different levels of formality.
- Apologizing and RepairingC1 — Match Esperanto apology and repair strategies to responsibility, harm, conversational trouble, and the remedy required.
- Reformulation and ClarificationB1 — Restate, specify, repair, and check meaning in Esperanto without confusing equivalence, correction, and inference.
- Echo QuestionsB1 — How Esperanto repeats a word or proposition to request confirmation, signal surprise, or repair a misunderstanding.
- ProB2 — Use pro for cause and motive, while distinguishing reasons from purposes and recognizing traditional exchange uses.
- Formal CorrespondenceC1 — Structure clear formal Esperanto letters and email with appropriate salutations, requests, references, closings, and institutional tone.