Weten, Kunnen, Mogen — Irregular Summary

Three of the most common verbs in Dutch are irregular in a way English speakers find slippery: weten ("to know a fact"), kunnen ("can / to be able"), and mogen ("may / to be allowed"). All three change their vowel in the past and all three take hebben. The two modalskunnen and mogen — add a wrinkle English doesn't have: when they govern another verb in the perfect, they appear not as a participle but as a bare infinitive (Ik heb niet kunnen komen, "I haven't been able to come"). This "infinitivus pro participio" (IPP) is the single most important thing to learn here, because it overrides the participle forms you'd otherwise expect. This page lays out all three side by side.

Weten — "to know (a fact)" (irregular, HEBBEN)

Weten means "to know a fact or piece of information" — distinct from kennen, which means "to be acquainted with a person, place, or thing." You weet that the shop closes at six; you kent the shopkeeper. Its past is wist / wisten (a vowel change plus a -st ending — a mixed pattern), and its participle is geweten. It takes hebben.

Principal parts

InfinitiveSimple past (sg.)Past participlePerfect auxiliary
wetenwistgewetenhebben

Classification: irregular (vowel change e → i plus the dental -st).

Present tense

PersonFormNote
ikweetbare stem (long ee)
jij / jeweetstem already ends in -t; no second -t
(inversion)weet je?
uweetformal
hij / zij / hetweetstem already ends in -t
wij / jullie / zijweten= infinitive

Simple past

PersonForm
ik / jij / hijwist
wij / jullie / zijwisten

Perfect (hebben + geweten)

PersonForm
ikheb geweten
hij / zij / hetheeft geweten
wij / jullie / zijhebben geweten

Ik weet niet waar mijn telefoon is.

I don't know where my phone is. — present 'weet'.

Ze wist het antwoord meteen.

She knew the answer right away. — past 'wist'.

Dat heb ik altijd al geweten.

I've always known that. — perfect 'heb geweten'.

Kunnen — "can / to be able" (irregular modal, HEBBEN)

Kunnen is irregular even in the present: the singular has the stem kan, not kun, while jij has the alternative kunt alongside the common kan. The past is kon / konden, the participle gekund. As a modal governing another verb, its perfect uses the infinitive (kunnen), not the participle — that's the IPP. Gekund only appears when kunnen stands alone with no second verb (Ik heb het nooit gekund, "I never could do it").

Principal parts

InfinitiveSimple past (sg.)Past participlePerfect auxiliary
kunnenkongekund (or infinitive: kunnen, in IPP)hebben

Classification: irregular modal.

Present tense

PersonFormNote
ikkannot 'kun'
jij / jekunt / kanboth standard; 'kan' more colloquial
(inversion)kun je? / kan je?'kun je' is the set form
ukunt / kan'u kunt' more formal
hij / zij / hetkannot 'kunt'
wij / jullie / zijkunnen= infinitive
💡
Memorise the singular: ik kan, jij kunt of kan, hij kan. The form kunt belongs only to jij and u — never to ik or hij. Ik kun and hij kunt are both wrong.

Simple past

PersonForm
ik / jij / hijkon
wij / jullie / zijkonden

Perfect — the IPP construction

ConstructionForm
with a second verb (IPP → infinitive)Ik heb niet kunnen komen.
standing alone (participle)Ik heb het nooit gekund.

Ik kan je morgen helpen.

I can help you tomorrow. — present 'kan'.

We konden de trein niet halen.

We couldn't catch the train. — past plural 'konden'.

Sorry, ik heb je gisteren niet kunnen bellen.

Sorry, I wasn't able to call you yesterday. — IPP: infinitive 'kunnen', not 'gekund'.

Mogen — "may / to be allowed" (irregular modal, HEBBEN)

Mogen means "to be allowed / to be permitted" (and, with graag dropped, "to like" — ik mag hem wel, "I quite like him"). Its singular present is mag for ik / jij / hij alike. The past is mocht / mochten, the participle gemogen. Like kunnen, it uses the infinitive (mogen) in the perfect when it governs another verb (IPP); gemogen surfaces only when mogen stands alone, usually meaning "liked."

Principal parts

InfinitiveSimple past (sg.)Past participlePerfect auxiliary
mogenmochtgemogen (or infinitive: mogen, in IPP)hebben

Classification: irregular modal.

Present tense

PersonFormNote
ikmag
jij / jemagnot 'magt'
(inversion)mag je?
umag
hij / zij / hetmag
wij / jullie / zijmogen= infinitive

Simple past

PersonForm
ik / jij / hijmocht
wij / jullie / zijmochten

Perfect — the IPP construction

ConstructionForm
with a second verb (IPP → infinitive)Ik heb niet mogen meedoen.
standing alone (participle, "liked")Ik heb hem altijd gemogen.

Mag ik even langs?

May I come past for a moment? — present 'mag'.

Als kind mocht ik nooit lang opblijven.

As a child I was never allowed to stay up late. — past 'mocht'.

Ze heeft als enige niet mogen stemmen.

She was the only one who wasn't allowed to vote. — IPP: infinitive 'mogen'.

All three at a glance

InfinitivePresent (sg.)Past (sg. / pl.)ParticipleAuxEnglish
wetenweetwist / wistengewetenhebbento know (a fact)
kunnenkan / (jij) kuntkon / kondengekund (IPP: kunnen)hebbencan / be able
mogenmagmocht / mochtengemogen (IPP: mogen)hebbenmay / be allowed

Common Mistakes

❌ Ik kun je vanavond bellen.

Incorrect — the 'ik' form is 'kan', never 'kun'. 'Kunt/kun' belongs to jij/u only.

✅ Ik kan je vanavond bellen.

I can call you this evening.

❌ Hij kunt heel goed koken.

Incorrect — the 'hij' form is 'kan', not 'kunt'.

✅ Hij kan heel goed koken.

He can cook really well.

❌ Ik heb niet gekund komen.

Incorrect — when a modal governs another verb, the perfect uses the infinitive (IPP): 'heb niet kunnen komen'.

✅ Ik heb niet kunnen komen.

I haven't been able to come.

❌ Ze heeft gisteren niet gemogen meedoen.

Incorrect — IPP again: 'heeft niet mogen meedoen', not 'gemogen meedoen'.

✅ Ze heeft gisteren niet mogen meedoen.

She wasn't allowed to take part yesterday.

❌ Ik ken niet dat de winkel vandaag dicht is.

Incorrect verb — knowing a fact is 'weten', not 'kennen': 'Ik weet niet...'.

✅ Ik weet niet of de winkel vandaag dicht is.

I don't know whether the shop is closed today.

Key Takeaways

  • Weten ("know a fact"): weet → wist → geweten, hebben. Contrast with kennen ("be acquainted with").
  • Kunnen: singular ik kan, jij kunt/kan, hij kan — never ik kun or hij kunt. Past kon/konden.
  • Mogen: singular mag throughout. Past mocht/mochten.
  • Both modals use IPP in the perfect: with a second verb they appear as the bare infinitive (kunnen, mogen), not the participle. The participles gekund / gemogen surface only when the modal stands alone.

Now practice Dutch

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Dutch

Related Topics

  • Verb Reference: How to Use These TablesA2A guide to reading the verb-reference pages: what each conjugation table shows (present, simple past, perfect with its auxiliary, participle), how strong/weak/mixed verbs are labelled, why the auxiliary is flagged, and which verbs to master first.
  • Strong and Irregular Verbs: Master Reference TableB2A single scannable reference table of the most common Dutch strong, irregular, and mixed verbs — infinitive, simple past (singular and plural), past participle, auxiliary, and English — grouped by ablaut pattern so the regularities behind the irregulars become visible.
  • Modal Verbs: OverviewA2A map of the six Dutch modals — kunnen, mogen, moeten, willen, zullen, hoeven — and the one pattern they share: modal + bare infinitive at the end of the clause.
  • Hebben or Zijn in the PerfectB1Most Dutch verbs build the perfect with hebben, but verbs of change of state or location — and motion verbs once a destination is named — switch to zijn, following a deep telicity logic English has no equivalent for.
  • The 50 Most Common Verbs — Quick Reference TableA2A single master table of the 50 highest-frequency Dutch verbs — infinitive, English, present (hij-form), simple past (singular), past participle, perfect auxiliary, and strong/weak/mixed/irregular class — so you can look up any everyday verb at a glance.