Traditional grammar groups كَادَ، أَوْشَكَ، عَسَى among predicates of proximity and hope, but they do not mean the same thing. كاد يفعل presents an event as coming close to occurrence, أوشك أن يفعل presents it as imminent or on the verge, and عسى أن يفعل expresses hope or favorable possibility rather than a near miss.
Their complement frames also differ. كاد most often takes a bare indicative imperfect, though أنْ + subjunctive is also established. أوشك and عسى strongly favor أنْ + subjunctive in contemporary formal MSA. Organizing them by complement architecture is safer than assigning the English word almost to the whole traditional class.
The separate أنْ and the subjunctive guide develops the mood rule used in their overt-clause complements.
The three core frames
| Predicate | Core contemporary frame | Central meaning | Register |
|---|---|---|---|
| كَادَ / يَكَادُ | كاد + bare imperfect; also كاد أنْ + subjunctive | nearly; almost | neutral formal MSA |
| أَوْشَكَ / يُوشِكُ | أوشك أنْ + subjunctive | be on the verge of; be about to | formal, common in writing |
| عَسَى | عسى أنْ + subjunctive | may; hopefully; it is hoped | formal/elevated |
كَادَ / يَكَادُ is a hollow Form-I predicate traditionally assigned root ك و د. أَوْشَكَ / يُوشِكُ is Form IV from و ش ك. عسى is largely fixed in its perfect-shaped use in contemporary prose; rarer inherited inflected forms should not be treated as an everyday productive paradigm.
كاد + bare indicative imperfect
The most characteristic frame is كاد + subject + imperfect indicative. The imperfect clause describes the event that approached realization.
كاد الطفل يسقط من الدراجة، لكن والده أمسك به.
kāda ṭ-ṭiflu yasquṭu mina d-darrāja(h), lakinna wālidahu ʾamsaka bih.
The child almost fell off the bicycle, but his father caught him.
Bare يسقطُ is indicative. The following clause confirms that the fall did not occur. This nonoccurrence is a frequent inference with affirmative past كاد, especially for a punctual undesirable event, but context can cancel simplistic rules about whether the event ultimately happened.
كادت الحافلة تصطدم بالسيارة عند التقاطع.
kādati l-ḥāfilatu taṣṭadimu bi-s-sayyārati ʿinda t-taqāṭuʿ.
The bus nearly collided with the car at the intersection.
Both كادتْ and the understood subject of تصطدمُ are feminine singular. Form-VIII اِصْطَدَمَ / يَصْطَدِمُ “collide” has root ص د م; its ت assimilates after emphatic ص to surface ط.
Imperfect يكادُ can place the near-occurrence in a present or general frame:
تكاد بطارية الهاتف تنفد، فاشحن الهاتف الآن.
takādu baṭṭāriyyatu l-hātifi tanfadu, fa-shḥani l-hātifa l-ʾān.
The phone battery is almost empty, so charge the phone now. (Addressing one man.)
كاد أنْ + subjunctive
Overt أنْ is possible with كاد, especially when the complement is heavier or the writer chooses an explicit clause boundary. It governs the subjunctive.
كاد الطفل أن يسقط من الدراجة عند المنعطف.
kāda ṭ-ṭiflu ʾan yasquṭa mina d-darrājati ʿinda l-munʿaṭaf.
The child almost fell off the bicycle at the bend.
Compare bare indicative يسقطُ with overt-أنْ subjunctive يسقطَ. In ordinary unvocalized text they look alike, but a plural makes the mood contrast visible:
كاد العاملان أن يفقدا توازنهما فوق السلم.
kāda l-ʿāmilāni ʾan yafqidā tawāzunahumā fawqa s-sullam.
The two workers almost lost their balance on the ladder.
Preceding كادَ is singular in neutral VSO before overt dual العاملانِ. Subjunctive يفقدا agrees with the two workers and loses indicative ن.
أوشك: stronger imminence with أنْ
أوشك أنْ often corresponds to “be about to” or “be on the verge of.” Its complement is normally explicit أنْ + subjunctive in contemporary formal usage.
أوشك القطار أن يصل إلى المحطة.
ʾawshaka l-qiṭāru ʾan yaṣila ʾilā l-maḥaṭṭa(h).
The train was about to arrive at the station.
توشك البطارية أن تنفد، فنحتاج إلى شحنها الآن.
tūshiku l-baṭṭāriyyatu ʾan tanfada, fa-naḥtāju ʾilā shaḥnihā l-ʾān.
The battery is about to run out, so we need to charge it now.
توشكُ is imperfect indicative; تنفدَ is subjunctive after أنْ. Do not assign the same mood to both verbs merely because they occur together.
A neutral contemporary paraphrase is كان على وشك أن... “was on the verge of...” or present هو على وشك أن.... The paraphrase makes the event-distance relation explicit.
كانت الطائرة على وشك أن تقلع عندما تغير الطقس.
kānati ṭ-ṭāʾiratu ʿalā washki ʾan tuqliʿa ʿindamā taghayyara ṭ-ṭaqs.
The plane was about to take off when the weather changed.
عسى expresses hope or possibility, not “almost”
عسى أنْ + subjunctive presents an event as hoped for or favorably possible. It does not say that the event nearly occurred.
عسى أن تتحسن الأحوال قريبا.
ʿasā ʾan tataḥassana l-ʾaḥwālu qarībā.
Hopefully, conditions will improve soon. (Formal/elevated)
عسى الفريق أن يجد حلا قبل نهاية اليوم.
ʿasā l-farīqu ʾan yajida ḥallan qabla nihāyati l-yawm.
May the team find a solution before the end of the day. (Formal/elevated)
For a neutral institutional forecast, من المتوقع أن “it is expected that” may be more precise. For an explicit personal hope, نأمل أن “we hope that” is often clearer.
نأمل أن تتحسن الخدمة بعد التحديث.
naʾmulu ʾan tataḥassana l-khidmatu baʿda t-taḥdīth.
We hope that the service will improve after the update.
This paraphrase is neutral contemporary formal MSA; it states who holds the hope.
Negated كاد is context-sensitive
Negation can take scope over proximity or produce the conventional reading “hardly/scarcely.” A slogan such as “affirmative كاد negates, negative كاد affirms” hides this real ambiguity.
With a gradual or perceptual event, لم يكد often means “hardly”:
لم تكد الطفلة تسمع التعليمات بسبب الضجيج، لكنها فهمت الكلمات الأخيرة.
lam takadi ṭ-ṭiflatu tasmaʿu t-taʿlīmāti bi-sababi ḍ-ḍajīj, lakinnahā fahimati l-kalimāti l-ʾakhīra(h).
The girl could barely hear the instructions because of the noise, but she understood the final words.
The final clause confirms minimal hearing rather than none. With a telic danger and a safety explanation, context can instead negate proximity itself:
لم يكد السائق يفقد السيطرة؛ كانت السرعة منخفضة والطريق خاليا.
lam yakadi s-sāʾiqu yafqidu s-sayṭara(h); kānati s-surʿatu munkhafiḍatan wa-ṭ-ṭarīqu khāliyā.
The driver did not come close to losing control; the speed was low and the road was clear.
Jussive يكدْ / تكدْ receives a linking kasra before the article. If the intended meaning must be unmistakable, use بالكاد سمع “barely heard” or لم يكن على وشك أن يفقد “was not close to losing.”
Inflection and modern productivity
كاد and أوشك inflect for their subject. With كاد, hollow-stem shortening appears before consonant-initial suffixes:
| Subject | كاد | أوشك |
|---|---|---|
| أنا | كِدْتُ | أَوْشَكْتُ |
| هي | كَادَتْ | أَوْشَكَتْ |
| نحن | كِدْنَا | أَوْشَكْنَا |
| هم | كَادُوا | أَوْشَكُوا |
كدنا نفوت الرحلة بسبب الازدحام.
kidnā nufawwitu r-riḥlata bi-sababi l-izdiḥām.
We nearly missed the trip because of the traffic.
Bare نفوّتُ is indicative. The weak hollow shape كدنا, not an invented كادنا, belongs to the verified inflection.
Other traditional members require register labels. كَرَبَ is rare (literary/archaic), while حَرَى and اِخْلَوْلَقَ are inherited (Classical/literary, rare) rather than neutral productive choices for modern learners. Recognize them in older texts; do not substitute them freely for كاد، أوشك، عسى.
Common Mistakes
Placing an adverbial “almost” mechanically
❌ تقريبا سقط الطفل من الدراجة.
Incorrect as the standard near-occurrence construction — use كاد as the predicate.
✅ كاد الطفل يسقط من الدراجة.
kāda ṭ-ṭiflu yasquṭu mina d-darrāja(h).
The child almost fell off the bicycle.
Retaining indicative nūn after أنْ
❌ أوشك المسافرون أن يصلون إلى الفندق.
Incorrect — أنْ governs subjunctive يصلوا without final nūn.
✅ أوشك المسافرون أن يصلوا إلى الفندق.
ʾawshaka l-musāfirūna ʾan yaṣilū ʾilā l-funduq.
The travelers were about to arrive at the hotel.
Forcing every predicate into the كاد frame
❌ عسى المشروع ينجح العام المقبل.
Nonstandard as the core contemporary frame — عسى strongly favors أنْ + subjunctive.
✅ عسى أن ينجح المشروع العام المقبل.
ʿasā ʾan yanjaḥa l-mashrūʿu l-ʿāma l-muqbil.
May the project succeed next year. (Formal/elevated)
Giving negated كاد one automatic meaning
❌ لم يكد يسمع تعني دائما أنه لم يسمع شيئا.
Incorrect — in context it often means “he barely heard,” while other contexts can negate proximity.
✅ لم يكد يسمع الصوت، لكنه أدرك كلمة واحدة.
lam yakad yasmaʿu ṣ-ṣawt, lakinnahu ʾadraka kalimatan wāḥida(h).
He could barely hear the sound, but he made out one word.
Presenting a Classical member as neutral modern MSA
❌ حرى صيغة شائعة في العربية المعاصرة.
Incorrect claim — حرى is not a common contemporary choice.
✅ من المتوقع أن ينجح المشروع.
mina l-mutawaqqaʿi ʾan yanjaḥa l-mashrūʿ.
The project is expected to succeed. (Neutral formal MSA)
Key Takeaways
- كاد normally takes a bare indicative imperfect but can take أنْ + subjunctive.
- أوشك strongly favors أنْ + subjunctive and highlights imminence.
- عسى أنْ expresses hope or favorable possibility, not near-occurrence.
- Negated كاد can mean “hardly” or deny proximity; context and paraphrase resolve the scope.
- Inflect كاد and أوشك accurately, and label rare traditional sisters rather than presenting them as neutral contemporary MSA.
Now practice Arabic
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Arabic →Related Topics
- كان قد + PerfectA2 — Use كان قد plus the perfect for an event completed before a past reference point, while preferring simpler sequence when it is clear.
- بدأ and Inchoative Verb ConstructionsA2 — Express beginning with بدأ, direct imperfect and أنْ complements, verbal nouns, and carefully labeled inchoative alternatives.
- The Arabic Verb SystemA1 — See how Arabic verb stems, agreement, mood, voice, and derived Forms work together in complete sentences.
- أن + Subjunctive ComplementB1 — Use light أن with a finite subjunctive complement, tracking who performs the embedded action and when a verbal noun is a better alternative.