Chinese, Mandarin

Spanish

English

Hindi

Arabic

Portuguese

Bengali

Russian

Japanese

Punjabi

German

Javanese

Malay

Telugu

Vietnamese

Korean

French

Marathi

Tamil

Urdu

Turkish

Italian

Chinese, Yue / Cantonese

Thai

Gujarati

Chinese, Jin

Chinese, Min Nan

Persian, Dari

Persian, Western

Polish

Pashto

Kannada

Chinese, Xiang

Malayalam

Sundanese

Hausa

Odia

Burmese

Chinese, Hakka

Ukrainian

Bihari, Bhojpuri

Tagalog

Yoruba

Bihari, Maithili

Uzbek

Sindhi

Amharic

Fula

Romanian

Oromo

Igbo

Azerbaijani

Chinese, Gan

Dutch

Kurdish, Central

Kurdish, Northern

Kurdish, Southern

Malagasy

Lahnda, Saraiki

Nepali

Sinhalese

Chittagonian

Zhuang

Khmer

Turkmen

Assamese

Madurese

Somali

Marwari

Bihari, Magahi

Haryanvi

Hungarian

Chhattisgarhi

Greek, Modern

Chewa

Dakhini

Akan, Twi

Akan, Fante

Kazakh

Chinese, Min Bei

Sylheti

Zulu

Czech

Kinyarwanda

Marwari, Dhundhari

Haitian Creole

Chinese, Min Dong

Ilocano

Quechua

Kirundi

Swedish

Hmong

Shona

Uyghur

Hiligaynon

Mossi

Xhosa

Belarusian

Balochi

World History 1

<OpenstaxParagraph>
	The concept of evolution over time is one we are all likely familiar with. Consider, for example, how technology has evolved. The first true smartphones appeared on the market at the beginning of this century, but these complicated devices didn’t spring all at once from the minds of ambitious engineers. Rather, these engineers built on technology that had evolved and improved over many decades. In the mid-1800s, telegraph technology first demonstrated that electricity could be used for long-distance communication. That technology paved the way for the first telephones, which were basic and expensive but over many decades became more sophisticated, more common, and cheaper. By the early 1980s, electronics companies had begun selling telephones that used radio technology to communicate wirelessly. Over time these devices were made faster and smaller, and companies added features like cameras, microprocessors, and eventually internet access. With these evolutionary transformations, the smartphone was born.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxNote>
	<OpenstaxNoteTitle> Link to Learning </OpenstaxNoteTitle> 
	<OpenstaxParagraph>
		Use this <a href="https://openstax.org/l/77Phylogenetics">guided activity from the Evolution Lab to explore how we study biological relationships between species using phylogenetics</a> to learn more. Try to create your own “Tree of Life.”
	</OpenstaxParagraph>
</OpenstaxNote>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	Modern humans are not smartphones, and in human history, chance biological adaptations to a changing environment drove the evolutionary process rather than the minds of inventors conceiving of technical innovations. But the evolutionary process that eventually gave birth to our species resembles the technological evolution of smartphones and other devices in some important ways. Just like we can trace the evolution of the smartphone back to the telegraph, so can we trace our own evolution back to a very distant ancestor called <OpenstaxTerm><OpenstaxEm>Australopithecus</OpenstaxEm></OpenstaxTerm>, who lived in eastern and southern Africa between 2.5 and 4 million years ago. Lucy, previously mentioned, was of the genus <OpenstaxEm>Australopithecus</OpenstaxEm> (<a href="#fig-00001">Figure 2.3</a>). A <OpenstaxTerm>genus</OpenstaxTerm> is a taxonomic rank that includes several similar and related species within it. Like us, members of Lucy’s species <OpenstaxEm>afarensis</OpenstaxEm> (named for the Afar region of East Africa where she was found) were capable of walking upright and likely used tools. Beyond that, however, they were very different from us. They had plenty of hair like chimpanzees, fingers and arms well suited for climbing trees, and brains about one-third the size of ours. Despite these differences, scholars have concluded that the genus <OpenstaxTerm><OpenstaxEm>Homo</OpenstaxEm></OpenstaxTerm> (“human”) evolved from <OpenstaxEm>Australopithecus</OpenstaxEm> somewhere around two to three million years ago.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxFigure id="fig-00001" src="https://openstax.org/apps/archive/20240226.174525/resources/a7e130ebeb386b255f3305c3777751fe1f4b8040" alt="A picture of unconnected pieces of a skeleton are shown on a white background. The bones are pale brown to dark brown in color and in broken pieces. From the top to the bottom, these bones shown are: five pieces of the skull, the lower jaw with teeth on the left side, one piece of the left clavicle, five pieces of the spine, six pieces of each arm, nine pieces of ribs from the left side, eight pieces of ribs from the right side, one piece of the lower spine, the tailbone, the right piece of the hip, the top of the right leg, one piece of the top of the left leg, the left knee joint, and a small piece of the left leg." mediaType="image/jpg" width="966" height="401" />
<OpenstaxFigureText width="966">
	Figure 2.3 Despite the incomplete state of the remains of Lucy, a member of the ancient genus Australopithecus, the similarities between her and modern humans of the genus Homo are striking. This image is a photoshopped reproduction of her skeleton. (credit: modification of work “Reconstruction of the fossil skeleton of &quot;Lucy&quot; the Australopithecus afarensis” by “120”/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.5)
</OpenstaxFigureText>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	Possibly the earliest member of the genus <OpenstaxEm>Homo</OpenstaxEm> was <OpenstaxTerm><OpenstaxEm>Homo habilis</OpenstaxEm></OpenstaxTerm> (<a href="#fig-00002">Figure 2.4</a>). This species appears in the archaeological record about two to three million years ago. <OpenstaxEm>Habilis</OpenstaxEm> means “handy”; it was thought at one time that this was the first species to have created stone tools. We now know that stone tools predate <OpenstaxEm>Homo habilis</OpenstaxEm>, but the name has stuck. <OpenstaxEm>Homo habilis</OpenstaxEm> resembles us in many ways, with a large brain similar to ours as well as small teeth and a face we might recognize as human. But members of the species also had many ape-like characteristics, such as long arms, hairy bodies, and adult heights of only three or four feet.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxFigure id="fig-00002" src="https://openstax.org/apps/archive/20240226.174525/resources/8c2b42cee064cba2832f1f358a0b885fd3fbfbf9" alt="A picture of a skull is shown on a white to black ombre background. The bones are brown/gray in color. The top of the skull is round and cracked in places with a piece of bone missing on the right side. Large brow ridges, eye and nose holes, and the upper jaw are shown. Three teeth are shown on the left and two teeth are shown on the right upper jaw with a gap in the middle. Part of the right cheekbone is missing. The holes and broken pieces are filled in with a gray substance." mediaType="image/jpg" width="650" height="850" />
<OpenstaxFigureText width="650">
	Figure 2.4 Partially restored remains, like the skull represented by this replica, are some of the most important evidence we have of the human ancestor Homo habilis. (credit: “Skull of Homo Habilis (Replica)” by “Luna04”/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.5)
</OpenstaxFigureText>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	Around two million years ago, a species even more similar to us, <OpenstaxTerm><OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm>,</OpenstaxTerm> emerged in East Africa. It likely evolved from <OpenstaxEm>Homo habilis</OpenstaxEm>. As the name <OpenstaxEm>erectus</OpenstaxEm> for “upright” suggests, this species lived entirely on the ground and walked—even ran—exclusively in an upright position. The consequences of this evolutionary shift were huge. Being upright meant that the body’s digestive organs were pulled down lower and into a smaller space. That in turn necessitated a change in diet, away from tough plants and toward easier-to-digest items like nuts, fruits, tubers, honey, and even meat. Living on the ground was also more dangerous because it made eluding predators more difficult. However, the upright position left <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm>’s hands free to use tools. This advantage likely led to further evolutions that made human hands more dexterous over time, prompting the wider adoption of ever more sophisticated tools.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	Members of <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> shared other close similarities with modern humans. They were about the same height as we are, sometimes reaching just over six feet. They made and used relatively sophisticated stone tools and relied on fire for both warmth and cooking food. They likely constructed huts of wood and fur in which to live and worked cooperatively with each other to hunt and forage. The position of the larynx in the throat also suggests that <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> may have had some capacity to communicate vocally, which would have aided in cooperative endeavors. Finally, archaeologists have uncovered strong evidence that <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> cared for the sick and elderly. This evidence includes the discovery of the remains of individuals who suffered from debilitating diseases yet lived a long time, indicating that assistance was both necessary and provided by others. Together these characteristics made the species highly adaptable to changing climates and environments, helping explain why its members survived for so long. <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> populations lived until as recently as about 100,000 years ago.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	Sometime between 1.8 and 1.5 million years ago, <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> started migrating into other parts of Africa and beyond, reaching North Africa, the Near East, Europe, and East and South Asia over hundreds of thousands of years. The reasons for this extensive migration are still debated, but they likely included climate change and the desire to follow certain types of prey. <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> appears to have stayed close to rivers and lakes during migration, hunting and eating animals like rhinoceroses, bears, pigs, and crocodiles, as discoveries in the Near East have confirmed. Populations evolved to adapt to the different environmental conditions into which they moved. Over time this led to a diversity of human species, including <OpenstaxEm>Homo heidelbergensis</OpenstaxEm>; <OpenstaxEm>Homo neanderthalensis,</OpenstaxEm> or <OpenstaxTerm>Neanderthals</OpenstaxTerm>; Denisovans; and modern humans, or <OpenstaxTerm><OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm></OpenstaxTerm> (<OpenstaxEm>sapiens</OpenstaxEm> means “wise”). Some of these species, like Denisovans and Neanderthals, emerged outside Africa. Others<OpenstaxEm>,</OpenstaxEm> like <OpenstaxEm>Homo heidelbergensis</OpenstaxEm> and <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm>, emerged in Africa first and later migrated to other areas.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	The extent to which these different human species interacted with each other remains unclear. DNA evidence from a bone found in Siberia has shown that a girl (who died at age thirteen) was born there of a Denisovan father and a Neanderthal mother. Another recent study demonstrated that modern European and Middle Eastern populations have between 1 and 4 percent Neanderthal DNA. This appears to suggest that mating between <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm> and Neanderthals was quite common. The careful work of archaeologists and other scholars has also made clear that some species evolved from others. For example, both Neanderthals and Denisovans appear to have evolved from populations of <OpenstaxEm>Homo heidelbergensis</OpenstaxEm>.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	At some point between forty thousand and fifteen thousand years ago, the diversity of human species declined and only <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm> remained. Two models attempt to explain why. The first and most commonly accepted is the “<OpenstaxTerm>out of Africa</OpenstaxTerm>” model. This theory suggests that modern humans emerged first in Africa approximately 200,000 years ago and then, approximately 100,000 years ago, expanded out of Africa and replaced all other human species. The second model is often called the “<OpenstaxTerm>multiregional evolution model</OpenstaxTerm>” and proposes that <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm> evolved from <OpenstaxEm>Homo erectus</OpenstaxEm> in several places around the same time. This model emerged as an explanation for the great diversity of modern human traits in different populations around the world. But it relies primarily on the study of fossils and archaeological records rather than on genetic data.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxParagraph>
	These theories about human evolution are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and the real answer to the puzzle may be a combination of the two. For example, it’s entirely possible that modern humans or a common ancestor did emerge first in Africa. Then, as this species expanded around the world, it mixed its genetic information with that of other human species. The DNA evidence collected in recent years certainly suggests a more complicated picture, and the debate has not yet been settled. The tools of both archaeology and molecular genetics continue to reveal new insights into the puzzle of human <OpenstaxTerm>evolution</OpenstaxTerm> and the rise of <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm>. And the conclusions we can draw about our distant past will continue to change as we learn more.
</OpenstaxParagraph>
<OpenstaxNote>
	<OpenstaxNoteTitle> Dueling Voices </OpenstaxNoteTitle> <OpenstaxH3> What Happened to Neanderthals in Europe? </OpenstaxH3>
	<OpenstaxParagraph>
		For tens of thousands of years before <OpenstaxEm>Homo sapiens</OpenstaxEm> arrived in Europe, the continent was home to Neanderthals (<a href="#fig-00003">Figure 2.5</a>). Then, about forty thousand years ago, right around the time modern humans entered Europe, the species <OpenstaxEm>neanderthalensis</OpenstaxEm> began to rapidly die out. For more than a century and a half, scholars have been trying to understand why.
	</OpenstaxParagraph><OpenstaxFigure id="fig-00003" src="https://openstax.org/apps/archive/20240226.174525/resources/8c1eb693045f6f221319d65aab05be5fe623ec38" alt="A picture of a woman is shown. She is brown-skinned with long, thin, messy, brown hair that falls to her shoulders in wisps. Her blue eyes are round and set in thick, high, hairless brow ridges. Her nose is small and rounded and her lips are thin and show large teeth. She wears furry clothing on her shoulders." mediaType="image/jpg" width="500" height="606" />
	<OpenstaxFigureText width="500">
		Figure 2.5 This modern reconstruction of what a Neanderthal woman may have looked like demonstrates a striking resemblance to modern humans. (credit: “Reconstruction of Neanderthal woman (makeup by Morten Jacobsen)” by Public Library of Science/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.5)
	</OpenstaxFigureText>
	<OpenstaxParagraph>
		One theory is that modern humans replaced the Neanderthals in Europe through violent competition, including a type of warfare between the two groups. Another model argues that the competition was less about violence and more about resources. This theory posits that modern humans were simply better tool makers, had better survival strategies, and possibly experienced lower mortality rates and higher birth rates. Neanderthals simply couldn’t keep up, and their small population dwindled and then disappeared entirely.
	</OpenstaxParagraph>
	<OpenstaxParagraph>
		Modern DNA analysis has opened the door for a new theory, that mating occurred between the two species and that the population of Neanderthals was simply absorbed by modern humans. The presence of small amounts of Neanderthal DNA in modern human populations lends some credibility to this idea, but it seems unlikely to explain the total disappearance of Neanderthals.
	</OpenstaxParagraph>
	<OpenstaxParagraph>
		Finally, analysis of climate change in Europe has revealed some variations that could have weakened Neanderthal populations and led to their disappearance in some areas. As of now, no one theory can account for everything. It seems possible that several factors were at play rather than a single primary cause, so the debate goes on.
	</OpenstaxParagraph>
	<OpenstaxUl>
		<OpenstaxLi>
			How might more than one of these reasons, or all of them, have contributed to the decline of Neanderthals in Europe?
		</OpenstaxLi>
		<OpenstaxLi>
			Can you think of any other explanations for the extinction of Neanderthals?
		</OpenstaxLi>
	</OpenstaxUl>
</OpenstaxNote>

2.1.1 Human Evolution

1 Understanding the Past

1.1 Developing a Global Perspective

1.1.1 World History as Preparation for Life after College

1.1.2 World History and Global Citizenship

1.1.3 Features of This Textbook

1.2 Primary Sources

1.2.1 Learning to Evaluate Documents and Images

1.2.2 Documentary Sources: Competing Narratives

1.2.3 Textual Sources: The Importance of Language

1.2.4 Hidden in History

1.3 Causation and Interpretation in History

1.3.1 Levels of Causation

1.3.2 Interpretation in History

2 Early Humans

2.1 Early Human Evolution and Migration

2.1.2 Why Did Humans Move and Where Did They Go?

2.1.3 Early Human Technologies

2.2 People in the Paleolithic Age

2.2.1 Ice, Ice, and More Ice

2.2.2 Life in the Paleolithic Age

2.2.3 Diverse Paleolithic Peoples

2.3 The Neolithic Revolution

2.3.1 The Development of Agriculture

2.3.2 How Farming Changed the Human Experience

2.3.3 Neolithic Peoples

3 Early Civilizations and Urban Societies

3.1 Early Civilizations

3.1.1 Attributes of Early Civilizations

3.1.2 The First Urban Societies

3.2 Ancient Mesopotamia

3.2.1 The Rise and Eclipse of Sumer

3.2.2 The Rise of the World’s First Empire

3.2.3 Later Empires in Mesopotamia

3.2.4 Society and Religion in Ancient Mesopotamia

3.3 Ancient Egypt

3.3.1 The Origins of Ancient Egypt

3.3.2 The Age of Pyramid Building

3.3.3 A Second Age of Egyptian Greatness

3.4 The Indus Valley Civilization

3.4.1 The Origins of the Indus Valley Civilization

3.4.2 Trade, Writing, and Religion

3.4.3 The Era of Decline

4 The Near East

4.1 From Old Babylon to the Medes

4.1.1 Power Politics in the Near East

4.1.2 Foreign Affairs and Trade

4.1.3 Daily Life and the Family in the Near East

4.2 Egypt’s New Kingdom

4.2.1 The Hyksos in Egypt

4.2.2 The Pharaohs of the New Kingdom

4.2.3 Egypt’s Foreign Policy

4.3 The Persian Empire

4.3.1 The Rise of Persia

4.3.2 Darius I and the Reorganization of the Empire

4.3.3 Persian Culture and Daily Life

4.4 The Hebrews

4.4.1 The History of the Hebrews

4.4.2 The Culture of the Hebrews

5 Asia in Ancient Times

5.1 Ancient China

5.1.1 Prehistoric China

5.1.2 Early Dynastic China

5.1.3 The Zhou Dynasty

5.1.4 The Warring States Era and Qin Unification

5.2 The Steppes

5.2.1 The Nomadic Culture of the Steppes

5.2.2 Tribes, Confederations, and Settled Neighbors

5.3 Korea, Japan, and Southeast Asia

5.3.1 Ancient Korea

5.3.2 Ancient Japan

5.4 Vedic India to the Fall of the Maurya Empire

5.4.1 Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro

5.4.2 The Aryans and Brahmanism

5.4.3 Buddhism

5.4.4 The Mauryan Empire

5.4.5 The Gupta Dynasty

6 Mediterranean Peoples

6.1 Early Mediterranean Peoples

6.1.1 The Late Bronze Age World

6.1.2 Phoenicians, Greeks, and Etruscans

6.2 Ancient Greece

6.2.1 Archaic Greece

6.2.2 Sparta and Athens

6.2.3 Classical Greece

6.3 The Hellenistic Era

6.3.1 The Kingdom of Macedon

6.3.2 Hellenistic Culture

6.4 The Roman Republic

6.4.1 The Foundation and Function of the Roman Republic

6.4.2 The Expansion of the Roman Republic

6.5 The Age of Augustus

6.5.1 The First Triumvirate

6.5.2 From Republic to Principate

7 Experiencing the Roman Empire

7.1 The Daily Life of a Roman Family

7.1.1 The Structure of Roman Families

7.1.2 A Day in the Life of a Roman Family

7.1.3 What Family Meant in Rome

7.2 Slavery in the Roman Empire

Question	Answer
a taxonomic rank that includes several similar and related species	genus
members of the genus Homo who evolved from Homo erectus and lived in Europe and western Asia between 30,000 and 200,000 years ago	Neanderthals