Suçu işlediğini inkâr etti.

Questions & Answers about Suçu işlediğini inkâr etti.

How exactly does işlediğini translate to "that he committed"?
This uses the -dIk factive clause structure you are currently learning. It breaks down like this: işle (commit) + -diğ (the past/present suffix -dik, softened due to the vowel) + -i (his/her, the possessive suffix) + -n- (buffer letter) + -i (accusative case). Literally, it translates to "his having committed", and the accusative case marks the whole chunk as the direct object of the main verb inkâr etti (he denied).
Why do both suçu and işlediğini take the accusative case?
They are objects for two different verbs! Suçu (the crime) is the direct object of the inner verb işlemek (to commit). Then, the entire clause suçu işlediğini (that he committed the crime) becomes the direct object of the main verb, inkâr etti (he denied). Because of this, işlediğini gets its own accusative ending.
Could işlediğini also mean "that you committed"?
Yes, it absolutely could! Out of context, işlediğini is ambiguous. It could be işlediği (his/her committing) + -n- (buffer) + -i (accusative), OR it could be işlediğin (your committing) + -i (accusative). Without pronouns like onun (his) or senin (your) at the start of the sentence, we rely on context. Here, "He denied that he committed the crime" is the most logical translation.
Why is there a circumflex (the little hat) on the "a" in inkâr?
The circumflex (^) is used in some loanwords (mostly from Arabic or Persian) to show that the preceding consonant is palatalized (softened) and the vowel is pronounced slightly longer. In inkâr, it tells us to soften the "k", so the second syllable sounds a bit like "kyar" rather than a hard "kar".

Learn Suçu işlediğini inkâr etti and more in Turkish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free