Breakdown of Varför skulle jag stjäla den där matlådan?
jag
I
varför
why
stjäla
to steal
den där
that (en)
skulle
would
matlådan
the lunch box
Questions & Answers about Varför skulle jag stjäla den där matlådan?
Why use skulle here if the speaker isn't talking about the past?
Even though skulle is the past tense of ska (will), here it acts as a conditional verb to express disbelief or indignation. By asking Varför skulle jag... (Why would I...), the speaker is emphasizing that the very idea of them stealing the lunch box is absurd or logically impossible.
Why does matlåda have the definite ending -n after den där?
Swedish uses a grammar rule often called "double determination" with phrases like den här (this) and den där (that). You must point out the specific object twice: once with the demonstrative den där, and again by adding the definite suffix to the noun to make it matlådan. Saying den där matlåda sounds grammatically incomplete.
Is stjäla the most natural verb to use here for stealing a lunch box?
Stjäla is perfectly correct and understood, but because stealing a lunch box is a petty offense, a Swede would very likely use the colloquial verb sno (to pinch, swipe, or nick) in everyday speech: Varför skulle jag sno den där matlådan?
Does matlåda imply a child's lunch box like it often does in English?
No, a matlåda (literally "food box") is completely standard for adults in Sweden. It refers to any container used to bring leftovers or a packed lunch to work. Bringing your matlåda to the office microwave is a staple of Swedish workplace culture.
Learn Varför skulle jag stjäla den där matlådan and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free