Log inSign up

Dunsen ska ha varit oförklarlig.

Dunsen ska ha varit oförklarlig.
The thud is said to have been inexplicable.
From Lesson 393:Presentational "det" (det hände en olycka)·Swedish

Questions & Answers about Dunsen ska ha varit oförklarlig.

Why couldn't we use a presentational det construction here, like Det ska ha varit dunsen oförklarlig?
Presentational det (used to introduce a new subject to the listener, similar to "There is..." or "There happened...") has a strict rule: the noun being introduced must be indefinite. Because we are talking about a specific, already known thud (dunsen is definite), we cannot use a presentational construction. If you wanted to introduce the thud for the first time using this grammar, you would use an indefinite noun: Det hördes en oförklarlig duns (An inexplicable thud was heard).
Doesn't ska mean "will" or "is going to"? Why is it translated as "is said to"?
While ska is used for future intentions, it has another very common use at this level: expressing hearsay or reported information. When you report something you have heard or read but didn't witness yourself, you use ska. When combined with the perfect infinitive (ha varit), it translates naturally to "is said to have been" or "supposedly was."
Could we say skulle ha varit instead of ska ha varit?
You could, but it would completely change the meaning. Ska ha varit means that people currently say the thud was inexplicable (hearsay). Skulle ha varit acts as a past conditional, meaning "would have been" (e.g., the thud would have been inexplicable if we hadn't found the source).
How does the word oförklarlig break down?
It is built from the verb att förklara (to explain). Adding the suffix -lig turns it into an adjective meaning "explainable" (förklarlig). Adding the negative prefix o- (un-/in-) makes it oförklarlig, which matches up perfectly with the English "in-explic-able."
If the subject were plural, like dunsarna (the thuds), how would the rest of the sentence change?
The adjective must agree with the subject in number. Because dunsarna is plural, the adjective would take the plural -a ending. The sentence would become: Dunsarna ska ha varit oförklarliga.

Learn Dunsen ska ha varit oförklarlig and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free
Start learning Swedish →