Learn Swedish: Kött äter jag aldrig.

The object kött (meat) is placed at the beginning of the sentence to emphasize it or contrast it with something else (e.g., 'I eat vegetables, but meat, I never eat'). Because Swedish strictly follows the V2 rule (the verb must be the second grammatical element), the verb äter must come right after kött, pushing the subject jag to the third position.

Why does aldrig come at the very end of the sentence?

In a standard Swedish main clause, a sentence adverb like aldrig (never) comes right after the verb (Jag äter aldrig kött). However, when you flip the sentence to start with the object, the verb and subject swap places to keep the verb in position two. The sentence adverb must then come after the subject in this inverted order, resulting in Object-Verb-Subject-Adverb (Kött äter jag aldrig).

Does putting kött first change the actual meaning of the sentence?

The literal meaning is exactly the same as Jag äter aldrig kött. It only changes the focus. You would typically use this structure in a conversation where food preferences are already being discussed, and you want to strongly highlight 'meat' as the specific thing you avoid.

Is it possible to say Kött jag äter aldrig, just like the English translation?