Myntet från skatten blev antagligen undersökt i laboratoriet.

Questions & Answers about Myntet från skatten blev antagligen undersökt i laboratoriet.

Why is it undersökt instead of having a special ett-word ending to match myntet?
The subject is myntet, which is an ett-word, so the past participle must take the ett-word form. For most verbs, this means ending in -t. Since the verb undersöka takes a -t in its base past participle form (because its stem ends in a hard consonant, k), the en-word and ett-word forms are actually identical: undersökt. If the subject were plural, it would become undersökta.
Could I use the s-passive (undersöktes) instead of blev undersökt here?
Yes, Myntet från skatten undersöktes antagligen works perfectly and means the same thing. The blev passive (dynamic passive) is very common in everyday Swedish and emphasizes the actual event of the coin being examined, while the s-passive can sound slightly more formal or factual.
Why is antagligen placed right in the middle of the verbs blev and undersökt?
In a main clause, sentence adverbs like antagligen (probably), inte (not), or alltid (always) go immediately after the first, conjugated verb. Here, blev is that first verb, so the adverb jumps in right after it, pushing the past participle undersökt further back in the sentence.
Why does the word for laboratory look like laboratoriet instead of laboratoriumet?
The sentence says it happened in the laboratory, so we need the definite form. Laboratorium is an ett-word that ends in -um. To make these specific loanwords definite, you drop the -um and add -et, which gives us laboratoriet.

Learn Myntet från skatten blev antagligen undersökt i laboratoriet and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free