Breakdown of He tamizado la harina, de modo que no hay grumos.
no
no / not
la harina
the flour
haber
there to be (existential)
tamizar
to sift
Questions & Answers about He tamizado la harina, de modo que no hay grumos.
Why do we use the indicative hay after de modo que instead of the subjunctive?
The phrase de modo que takes the indicative when it describes the actual result of an action. By using hay, the speaker is stating a fact: the flour was sifted, and as a result, there are currently no lumps.
How would the sentence change if we used the subjunctive haya?
Using the subjunctive haya changes the clause from a result to a purpose. The phrase de modo que no haya grumos tells us your intention for sifting the flour ('so that there won't be lumps'), whereas the indicative hay confirms the actual, successful outcome.
Are de manera que and de modo que interchangeable here?
Yes, they are completely interchangeable. Both mean 'so' or 'so that' and trigger the exact same grammar rules: indicative for a factual result, and subjunctive for an intended purpose.
What exactly are grumos?
The word grumos refers to lumps, clumps, or clusters that form in powdery mixtures or liquids. You will commonly see this word used when talking about baking with flour, mixing batter, or stirring paint.