Breakdown of Согласно уставу, нам пришлось уволить менеджера.
мы
we
менеджер
manager
прийтись
to have to (perfective)
уволить
to fire
согласно
according to
устав
charter
Questions & Answers about Согласно уставу, нам пришлось уволить менеджера.
Why is уставу in the Dative case here?
The preposition согласно (according to) requires the Dative case in modern Russian. You will routinely see it followed by Dative when referring to formal documents, rules, or agreements, such as согласно уставу (according to the charter) or согласно закону (according to the law).
Why use the impersonal нам пришлось instead of мы должны были for "we had to"?
The construction нам пришлось (using the past tense of прийтись with the Dative pronoun нам) specifically means you were forced to do something due to external circumstances. While мы должны были expresses a general obligation, нам пришлось emphasizes that firing the manager wasn't necessarily their desire, but the rules of the charter left them with no other choice.
Why is there a comma after уставу?
In Russian punctuation, introductory phrases that establish a condition or basis for the main clause—especially those starting with prepositions like согласно (according to) or вопреки (contrary to)—are typically set off by a comma when they appear at the very beginning of a sentence.
Why use the perfective verb уволить (to fire) in this sentence?
After expressions of necessity like пришлось, you use a perfective verb to indicate a specific, one-time completed action. Since firing the manager was a single event they had to carry out and finish, the perfective уволить is required rather than the imperfective увольнять.
Learn Согласно уставу, нам пришлось уволить менеджера and more in Russian
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free