Mimo że jest gwar, widzę, jak kieszonkowiec kradnie portfel.

Questions & Answers about Mimo że jest gwar, widzę, jak kieszonkowiec kradnie portfel.

Why do we use jak here instead of że?
This is the core of a perception clause! When using sensory verbs like widzieć (to see) or słyszeć (to hear), using jak emphasizes that you are directly observing the action as it happens ('I see him in the act of stealing'). If you used że (widzę, że...), it would mean 'I see that he is stealing,' which sounds more like a deduction or a realization rather than watching the physical event unfold live.
Why is the verb kradnie imperfective here?
The jak perception clause focuses on an action being in progress while you observe it. Since you are watching the act of stealing as it is currently unfolding, you need the imperfective aspect. Using a perfective verb wouldn't work for a present, ongoing observation.
Could I just say Mimo gwaru instead of Mimo że jest gwar?
Yes! Mimo że is a conjunction meaning 'even though,' and it must be followed by a full clause with a conjugated verb (jest gwar). Mimo (without że) is a preposition meaning 'despite,' and it must be followed by a noun in the genitive case. So mimo gwaru (despite the hubbub) is a perfectly natural, more concise alternative.
What exactly is gwar?
Gwar specifically refers to the background noise of people talking, bustling, or generally making a hubbub. You will often hear it in contexts like gwar uliczny (street noise) or gwar w restauracji (the buzz in a restaurant). It implies a continuous, overlapping human noise rather than a single loud sound.

Learn Mimo że jest gwar, widzę, jak kieszonkowiec kradnie portfel and more in Polish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free