Breakdown of Odrzucili roszczenie na skutek zaniedbania pracownika.
pracownik
employee
odrzucić
to reject
na skutek
due to (as a result of)
zaniedbanie
negligence
roszczenie
claim (legal or financial)
Questions & Answers about Odrzucili roszczenie na skutek zaniedbania pracownika.
Why does zaniedbanie change to zaniedbania in this sentence?
It changes because of the compound preposition na skutek (due to / as a result of), which always requires the genitive case. Since zaniedbanie is a neuter noun, its genitive form takes an -a, becoming zaniedbania.
Why are there two genitive nouns in a row (zaniedbania pracownika)?
This is a common Polish structure called a chain of genitives. The first one (zaniedbania) is in the genitive because it follows na skutek. The second one (pracownika) is also in the genitive, but this time to show possession (of the employee). Together, they translate to due to the negligence of the employee.
Could I use the other compound preposition we are learning, w wyniku, instead of na skutek?
Yes, you can use them interchangeably here. Both mean as a result of and both take the genitive case. You could easily say w wyniku zaniedbania. Na skutek sounds just a bit more formal or legal, which fits perfectly with an administrative word like roszczenie (claim).
Is roszczenie (claim) in the accusative case here, even though it looks like the nominative dictionary form?
Yes! It is the direct object of the verb odrzucili (they rejected), so it must be in the accusative case. Because roszczenie is a neuter noun ending in -e, its accusative form is exactly the same as its nominative form.
Learn Odrzucili roszczenie na skutek zaniedbania pracownika and more in Polish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free