Незважаючи на комісію, я скасував переказ коштів.

Незважаючи на means despite or in spite of.

In this sentence, Незважаючи на комісію means despite the fee/commission.

A helpful way to learn it is as a fixed expression: незважаючи на + accusative noun

So:

• незважаючи на дощ = despite the rain
• незважаючи на проблеми = despite the problems

Even though зважати by itself is related to paying attention to / taking into account, in this expression you should usually learn незважаючи на as one unit meaning despite.

Because незважаючи на requires the accusative case.

The dictionary form is комісія.
In the accusative singular, it becomes комісію.

So:

• nominative: комісія
• accusative: комісію

This is very common with feminine nouns ending in -ія:

• інструкція → інструкцію
• операція → операцію

It can mean different things depending on context, but in financial contexts it often means fee, service charge, or commission.

Here, with переказ коштів, the most natural meaning is a transaction fee or transfer fee.

So the phrase likely means:

• despite the fee
• despite the commission charge

In other contexts, комісія can also mean:

• a committee
• a commission in an official sense

Context tells you which meaning is intended.

Because Незважаючи на комісію is an introductory concessive phrase placed at the start of the sentence.

Ukrainian often separates such opening phrases with a comma:

• Незважаючи на втому, він працював далі.
• Попри труднощі, ми закінчили роботу.

So the comma helps mark the transition from the introductory idea despite the fee to the main clause я скасував переказ коштів.

Скасував means canceled, called off, or revoked, depending on context.

In this sentence, it means I canceled.

The verb is скасувати, which is usually perfective. That means it refers to a completed action:

• я скасував = I canceled / I did cancel

This fits well here, because canceling a transfer is normally a one-time completed action.

Because Ukrainian past tense agrees with gender and number.

Скасував is:

• past tense
• singular
• masculine

So this form tells you the speaker is male, or at least grammatically presented as male.

Other forms would be:

• я скасувала = I canceled (female speaker)
• ми скасували = we canceled

English does not show this in the verb, but Ukrainian does.

Переказ коштів means transfer of funds or money transfer.

Here:

• переказ = transfer, remittance
• коштів = of funds

Коштів is the genitive plural form of кошти.

This is because Ukrainian often uses the pattern: noun + genitive
to express something like transfer of funds, price of goods, center of the city, etc.

So:

• переказ коштів = transfer of funds
• обмін валют = exchange of currencies
• продаж квитків = sale of tickets

Both can work, but they are a little different in tone.

• кошти / коштів is more formal and common in financial, legal, or banking language
• гроші / грошей is the everyday word for money

So:

• переказ коштів sounds formal, technical, or banking-related
• переказ грошей sounds more everyday and conversational

In a sentence about a bank transfer, переказ коштів is very natural.

Yes, you often can.

If the context already makes it clear that you are talking about a money transfer, Я скасував переказ can sound perfectly natural.

Adding коштів makes it more explicit and slightly more formal:

• Я скасував переказ. = I canceled the transfer.
• Я скасував переказ коштів. = I canceled the transfer of funds.

The longer version is especially common in official or banking language.

Yes, Ukrainian word order is fairly flexible, though some orders sound more neutral than others.

The given sentence: Незважаючи на комісію, я скасував переказ коштів. is natural and neutral.

You could also say:

• Я скасував переказ коштів, незважаючи на комісію.

But that version may slightly shift the emphasis, making the despite the fee idea feel more like an added comment at the end.

Putting Незважаючи на комісію first highlights the contrast right away.

Yes. Попри can also mean despite.

So you could say: Попри комісію, я скасував переказ коштів.

Both are correct. The difference is mostly stylistic:

• незважаючи на is a little longer and often feels slightly more formal or explicit
• попри is shorter and very common

Both require the accusative case:

• попри комісію
• незважаючи на комісію

By itself, it only says despite the fee. It does not explicitly say the fee was high.

The sentence suggests that the fee was a factor that might have influenced the decision, but it does not explain exactly how large or important it was.

If you wanted to say the fee was high, Ukrainian would usually make that clearer, for example:

• Незважаючи на високу комісію... = Despite the high fee...
• Через високу комісію... = Because of the high fee...

So the original sentence is more neutral.